Generic Versus Personalized Foot-Ground Contact Models for Predictive Simulations of Walking: Is Personalization Worth the Effort?

PURPOSE: Quantification of walking function, including joint motions, ground reactions, and joint loads, outside the lab without the use of force plates is a growing research area. Because only joint motions can currently be measured outside the lab, researchers are utilizing tracking optimizations of walking to estimate associated ground reactions and inverse dynamic joint loads. However, foot-ground contact models used in such optimizations have been generic rather than personalized, which may limit the accuracy of estimated ground reactions and joint loads. This study compares the predictive capabilities of generic versus personalized deformable foot-ground contact models. METHODS: Generic and personalized deformable foot-ground contact models were evaluated in calibration and tracking optimizations performed using experimental walking data collected from three subjects in varying states of health. Foot-only calibration optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reaction and foot motion data while tracking both types of data simultaneously, while whole-body tracking optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reactions, joint motion, and joint load data while tracking only experimental joint motion data and achieving dynamic consistency. RESULTS: For all three subjects and both types of optimizations, personalized foot-ground contact models reproduced experimental ground reaction, joint motion, and joint load data more accurately than did generic foot-ground contact models. CONCLUSION: Personalized foot-ground contact models can improve the accuracy with which ground reactions and joint loads can be estimated via tracking optimizations of walking using only experimental motion data as inputs. Personalized models are easy to calibrate using freely available software tools and should improve the accuracy of predictive simulations of walking as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04386-1
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generic Versus Personalized Foot-Ground Contact Models for Predictive Simulations of Walking: Is Personalization Worth the Effort?

Benjamin Jon Fregly, Geng Li, Spencer T. Williams
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Generic Versus Personalized Foot-Ground Contact Models for Predictive Simulations of Walking: Is Personalization Worth the Effort?

Benjamin Jon Fregly, Geng Li, Spencer T. Williams
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantification of walking function, including joint motions, ground reactions, and joint loads, outside the lab without the use of force plates is a growing research area. Because only joint motions can currently be measured outside the lab, researchers are utilizing tracking optimizations of walking to estimate associated ground reactions and inverse dynamic joint loads. However, foot-ground contact models used in such optimizations have been generic rather than personalized, which may limit the accuracy of estimated ground reactions and joint loads. This study compares the predictive capabilities of generic versus personalized deformable foot-ground contact models. METHODS: Generic and personalized deformable foot-ground contact models were evaluated in calibration and tracking optimizations performed using experimental walking data collected from three subjects in varying states of health. Foot-only calibration optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reaction and foot motion data while tracking both types of data simultaneously, while whole-body tracking optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reactions, joint motion, and joint load data while tracking only experimental joint motion data and achieving dynamic consistency. RESULTS: For all three subjects and both types of optimizations, personalized foot-ground contact models reproduced experimental ground reaction, joint motion, and joint load data more accurately than did generic foot-ground contact models. CONCLUSION: Personalized foot-ground contact models can improve the accuracy with which ground reactions and joint loads can be estimated via tracking optimizations of walking using only experimental motion data as inputs. Personalized models are easy to calibrate using freely available software tools and should improve the accuracy of predictive simulations of walking as well.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Rice University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon