The Record Power Output 1–12 Test for Estimating the Anaerobic Threshold in Trained Athletes

Abstract The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Record Power Output 1–12 test as a practical field-based estimate of anaerobic threshold markers in trained cyclists and to compare its association and agreement with established laboratory-based methods. Twenty-three trained male cyclists performed both a standard incremental ramp test with capillary blood lactate measurements and the Record Power Output 1–12 protocol, consisting of a 1-minute maximal effort followed by a 12-minute maximal effort. Threshold estimation was calculated using the formula RPO12−(5%×RPO1). The Record Power Output 1–12 test values were compared with established anaerobic threshold markers, including D max variants, onset of blood lactate accumulation thresholds, second lactate turn point, critical power and expert-determined second lactate threshold. Associations were evaluated using linear regression while agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, 90% confidence intervals derived from the two one-sided test were reported descriptively. The Record Power Output 1–12 test showed strong correlations with all investigated anaerobic threshold markers (r=0.87–0.99). However, Bland–Altman analyses revealed relatively wide limits of agreement across comparisons, consistent with previous literature, and mean differences were the largest with D max (− 28.12 W) and Exp-D max (− 18.98 W). Overall, the Record Power Output 1–12 test demonstrated strong correlations with commonly used threshold markers but limited interchangeability at the individual level, suggesting potential utility for field-based athlete monitoring when laboratory testing is not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2974-4845
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Record Power Output 1–12 Test for Estimating the Anaerobic Threshold in Trained Athletes

Luca Filipas, Andrea Meloni, Antonio La Torre, Daniel J. Gotti et al.
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
article

The Record Power Output 1–12 Test for Estimating the Anaerobic Threshold in Trained Athletes

Luca Filipas, Andrea Meloni, Antonio La Torre, Daniel J. Gotti, Roberto Codella, Matteo Moraschini, Giorgio Brambilla
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Record Power Output 1–12 test as a practical field-based estimate of anaerobic threshold markers in trained cyclists and to compare its association and agreement with established laboratory-based methods. Twenty-three trained male cyclists performed both a standard incremental ramp test with capillary blood lactate measurements and the Record Power Output 1–12 protocol, consisting of a 1-minute maximal effort followed by a 12-minute maximal effort. Threshold estimation was calculated using the formula RPO12−(5%×RPO1). The Record Power Output 1–12 test values were compared with established anaerobic threshold markers, including D max variants, onset of blood lactate accumulation thresholds, second lactate turn point, critical power and expert-determined second lactate threshold. Associations were evaluated using linear regression while agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, 90% confidence intervals derived from the two one-sided test were reported descriptively. The Record Power Output 1–12 test showed strong correlations with all investigated anaerobic threshold markers (r=0.87–0.99). However, Bland–Altman analyses revealed relatively wide limits of agreement across comparisons, consistent with previous literature, and mean differences were the largest with D max (− 28.12 W) and Exp-D max (− 18.98 W). Overall, the Record Power Output 1–12 test demonstrated strong correlations with commonly used threshold markers but limited interchangeability at the individual level, suggesting potential utility for field-based athlete monitoring when laboratory testing is not feasible.

International Journal of Sports Medicine
Total (France) (FR), University of Milan (IT), MultiMedica (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon