Design implications of composite tunnel linings with varying stiffness and thickness in saturated sand: Insights from large-scale 1g shaking table tests

Composite tunnel linings constructed in saturated sand may experience complex seismic soil–structure interaction owing to the combined effects of wave propagation, excess pore water pressure buildup, and liquefaction-induced ground deformation. This study presents a series of large-scale 1g shaking table tests to investigate the seismic response of a shallow-buried composite double-layer tunnel lining system with varying inner lining stiffness and thickness. Sinusoidal sweep waves, low-amplitude recorded earthquake motions, and progressively intensified Tianjin earthquake motions were applied to examine acceleration amplification, lining strain redistribution, excess pore water pressure development, and macroscopic liquefaction-related phenomena under controlled saturated ground conditions. The results show that the predominant frequency of the saturated sand governs both acceleration amplification and pore pressure buildup, with pronounced responses occurring when the input frequency approaches the soil predominant frequency. Increasing the inner lining stiffness or thickness reduced lining acceleration by approximately 15–25% and outer lining strain by up to 30%, although excessive thickness occasionally caused localized amplification under high-frequency excitation. Liquefaction consistently initiated beneath the tunnel invert when the input PGA approached 0.3 g, regardless of lining configuration, and was accompanied by ground settlement, sand–water ejection, surface cracking, and slight tunnel uplift. The findings demonstrate that stiffness enhancement and thickness increase are not mechanically equivalent: increasing stiffness mainly redistributes seismic demand toward the inner lining, whereas increasing thickness modifies the response through a combined stiffness–mass effect. These results provide experimental evidence for understanding the seismic response of composite tunnel linings in saturated and liquefaction-prone ground.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110759
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design implications of composite tunnel linings with varying stiffness and thickness in saturated sand: Insights from large-scale 1g shaking table tests

Haifeng Huang, Fulin Qu, Kaixiang Fan, Jiayu Liang et al.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Design implications of composite tunnel linings with varying stiffness and thickness in saturated sand: Insights from large-scale 1g shaking table tests

Haifeng Huang, Fulin Qu, Kaixiang Fan, Jiayu Liang, Wengui Li, Shuhao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Composite tunnel linings constructed in saturated sand may experience complex seismic soil–structure interaction owing to the combined effects of wave propagation, excess pore water pressure buildup, and liquefaction-induced ground deformation. This study presents a series of large-scale 1g shaking table tests to investigate the seismic response of a shallow-buried composite double-layer tunnel lining system with varying inner lining stiffness and thickness. Sinusoidal sweep waves, low-amplitude recorded earthquake motions, and progressively intensified Tianjin earthquake motions were applied to examine acceleration amplification, lining strain redistribution, excess pore water pressure development, and macroscopic liquefaction-related phenomena under controlled saturated ground conditions. The results show that the predominant frequency of the saturated sand governs both acceleration amplification and pore pressure buildup, with pronounced responses occurring when the input frequency approaches the soil predominant frequency. Increasing the inner lining stiffness or thickness reduced lining acceleration by approximately 15–25% and outer lining strain by up to 30%, although excessive thickness occasionally caused localized amplification under high-frequency excitation. Liquefaction consistently initiated beneath the tunnel invert when the input PGA approached 0.3 g, regardless of lining configuration, and was accompanied by ground settlement, sand–water ejection, surface cracking, and slight tunnel uplift. The findings demonstrate that stiffness enhancement and thickness increase are not mechanically equivalent: increasing stiffness mainly redistributes seismic demand toward the inner lining, whereas increasing thickness modifies the response through a combined stiffness–mass effect. These results provide experimental evidence for understanding the seismic response of composite tunnel linings in saturated and liquefaction-prone ground.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringVol. 213
UNSW Sydney (AU), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Australian Research Council, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon