Teachers’ AI Literacy and Practices of Repair in Superdiverse Adult Learning and Education

This paper investigates how situated AI literacy is conceptualised and enacted in complex and heterogeneous ed­ucational environments such as Adult Education Centres in Italy. Qualitative data from semi-structured inter­views with ten headmasters and open-ended responses from forty-five teachers to an online questionnaire were thematically analysed. The findings suggest that headmasters advocate for more than mere technical training, articulating context-sensitive and practice-oriented views of teachers’ professional development in AI literacy. Teachers’ descriptions of their interactions with GenAI illustrate practices of evaluating, adjusting, and modi­fying AI-generated content, suggesting that the development of AI literacy occurs through practices of repair and maintenance in artificial conversations. Therefore, this study suggests participatory action research as a valuable approach for teachers’ professional development in AI literacy to account for their practices while providing them with space and time for critical reflection and practical experimentation with Generative AI in superdiverse educational environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Andragoška spoznanja
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/as/27765
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ AI Literacy and Practices of Repair in Superdiverse Adult Learning and Education

Enrico Vignando, Davide Zoletto
Andragoška spoznanja
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Teachers’ AI Literacy and Practices of Repair in Superdiverse Adult Learning and Education

Enrico Vignando, Davide Zoletto
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how situated AI literacy is conceptualised and enacted in complex and heterogeneous ed­ucational environments such as Adult Education Centres in Italy. Qualitative data from semi-structured inter­views with ten headmasters and open-ended responses from forty-five teachers to an online questionnaire were thematically analysed. The findings suggest that headmasters advocate for more than mere technical training, articulating context-sensitive and practice-oriented views of teachers’ professional development in AI literacy. Teachers’ descriptions of their interactions with GenAI illustrate practices of evaluating, adjusting, and modi­fying AI-generated content, suggesting that the development of AI literacy occurs through practices of repair and maintenance in artificial conversations. Therefore, this study suggests participatory action research as a valuable approach for teachers’ professional development in AI literacy to account for their practices while providing them with space and time for critical reflection and practical experimentation with Generative AI in superdiverse educational environments.

Andragoška spoznanjaVol. 32(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon