Digital Stratification in Carceral Higher Education: Justice, Governance and the Limits of Open Distance e-Learning in South African Correctional Facilities

Background Open Distance e-Learning (ODeL) has been positioned as a democratising force in higher education, particularly for marginalised populations such as incarcerated students. However, within South African correctional facilities, structural inequities continue to constrain meaningful participation in digitally mediated learning environments. While ODeL expands formal access, it does not necessarily translate into equitable participation, particularly in contexts characterised by institutional regulation and resource constraints. Methods Drawing on Nancy Fraser’s social justice framework of redistribution, recognition and representation, this qualitative exploratory study interrogates systemic barriers shaping incarcerated students’ engagement with ODeL. Data were generated through 26 individual interviews with 20 incarcerated students, four correctional education officials and two support staff members, four focus group discussions involving the same 20 incarcerated students in groups of five, and document analysis of institutional policy and ICT infrastructure records. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2019). Results Thematic analysis revealed intersecting structural constraints, including technological deprivation, limited academic support, institutional misrecognition, and exclusion from participatory decision-making. These constraints operate as mutually reinforcing conditions that shape the quality and depth of educational participation. Despite these barriers, participants demonstrated a strong commitment to education and described learning as central to identity reconstruction and social reintegration. Conclusions ODeL provision in correctional settings remains formally inclusive yet materially exclusionary. Justice-oriented restructuring is required to foreground digital equity, context-responsive pedagogical support, and participatory governance mechanisms that recognise incarcerated students as legitimate members of the academic community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179125.2
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Stratification in Carceral Higher Education: Justice, Governance and the Limits of Open Distance e-Learning in South African Correctional Facilities

Duduzile Elizabeth Mkhabela
F1000Research
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Digital Stratification in Carceral Higher Education: Justice, Governance and the Limits of Open Distance e-Learning in South African Correctional Facilities

Duduzile Elizabeth Mkhabela
article en

Abstract

Background Open Distance e-Learning (ODeL) has been positioned as a democratising force in higher education, particularly for marginalised populations such as incarcerated students. However, within South African correctional facilities, structural inequities continue to constrain meaningful participation in digitally mediated learning environments. While ODeL expands formal access, it does not necessarily translate into equitable participation, particularly in contexts characterised by institutional regulation and resource constraints. Methods Drawing on Nancy Fraser’s social justice framework of redistribution, recognition and representation, this qualitative exploratory study interrogates systemic barriers shaping incarcerated students’ engagement with ODeL. Data were generated through 26 individual interviews with 20 incarcerated students, four correctional education officials and two support staff members, four focus group discussions involving the same 20 incarcerated students in groups of five, and document analysis of institutional policy and ICT infrastructure records. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2019). Results Thematic analysis revealed intersecting structural constraints, including technological deprivation, limited academic support, institutional misrecognition, and exclusion from participatory decision-making. These constraints operate as mutually reinforcing conditions that shape the quality and depth of educational participation. Despite these barriers, participants demonstrated a strong commitment to education and described learning as central to identity reconstruction and social reintegration. Conclusions ODeL provision in correctional settings remains formally inclusive yet materially exclusionary. Justice-oriented restructuring is required to foreground digital equity, context-responsive pedagogical support, and participatory governance mechanisms that recognise incarcerated students as legitimate members of the academic community.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Digital Stratification in Carceral Higher Education: Justice, Governance and the Limits of Open Distance e-Learning in South African Correctional Facilities — Duduzile Elizabeth Mkhabela · F1000Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS