Reframing Hong Kong: Legitimation in the Post-National Security Law Era

In 2020, the Chinese government imposed the National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong, which transformed the liberal authoritarian regime into an illiberal one. This article examines how the government has tried to legitimise this regime change while promoting the growing integration of the territory into the Chinese state. It does so by analysing a newly created National Security Exhibition Gallery unveiled in 2024, which displays the new political narratives that are used to justify the changes. The article argues that the regime’s legitimacy discourse has shifted from institutional and procedural foundations to one centred on nationalism and the Chinese Communist Party, while continuing to invoke the longstanding rhetoric of ‘stability and prosperity’. Through a critical reading of the exhibit’s visual and textual narratives, the article shows how the state seeks to reshape public memory, reframe dissent, and align Hong Kong’s identity with the ideological norms of the mainland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Studies Review
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2026.2749596
Primary Topic
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing Hong Kong: Legitimation in the Post-National Security Law Era

Stephan Ortmann
Asian Studies Review
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
article

Reframing Hong Kong: Legitimation in the Post-National Security Law Era

Stephan Ortmann
article en

Abstract

In 2020, the Chinese government imposed the National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong, which transformed the liberal authoritarian regime into an illiberal one. This article examines how the government has tried to legitimise this regime change while promoting the growing integration of the territory into the Chinese state. It does so by analysing a newly created National Security Exhibition Gallery unveiled in 2024, which displays the new political narratives that are used to justify the changes. The article argues that the regime’s legitimacy discourse has shifted from institutional and procedural foundations to one centred on nationalism and the Chinese Communist Party, while continuing to invoke the longstanding rhetoric of ‘stability and prosperity’. Through a critical reading of the exhibit’s visual and textual narratives, the article shows how the state seeks to reshape public memory, reframe dissent, and align Hong Kong’s identity with the ideological norms of the mainland.

Asian Studies Review
Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon