Craniofacial Morphologic Changes and Associated Factors After Combined Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVE: To quantify craniofacial morphologic changes after combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment in patients with cleft lip and palate and to identify factors associated with horizontal relapse at A point after maxillary advancement. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 186 patients treated from January 2024 to January 2026. Cephalograms were analyzed at presurgical baseline (T0), within 1 week after surgery (T1), and at the last follow-up at least 6 months after surgery (T2). Horizontal relapse at A point was defined as posterior displacement of A point from T1 to T2 on an SN-based coordinate system after cranial-base superimposition. Measurement reliability was assessed in 30 randomly selected patients. Paired analyses quantified T0-to-T2 morphologic change, and multivariable models evaluated relapse magnitude and relapse of 2 mm or greater. RESULTS: The mean age was 20.7 years, 54.8% were male, and the mean follow-up was 14.7 months. From T0 to T2, SNA increased by 4.93 degrees, ANB by 7.12 degrees, Wits appraisal by 6.56 mm, and facial convexity by 8.82 degrees. The mean horizontal relapse at A point was 2.74 mm (95% CI, 2.60-2.89); 150 patients (80.6%) had a relapse of 2 mm or greater. Larger advancement, higher scar score, bilateral cleft phenotype, and segmental maxillary osteotomy were associated with greater relapse. Patient-specific fixation and concurrent bone grafting were associated with lower relapse, but these associations should be interpreted as noncausal. CONCLUSION: Combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment was associated with sagittal skeletal and profile improvement. Relapse at A point was measurable and was associated with movement magnitude, cleft phenotype, scarring, segmentation, fixation, and bony support. A clear definition of radiographic timing and coordinate-based relapse measurement is essential for interpreting stability after cleft orthognathic surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000013508
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Craniofacial Morphologic Changes and Associated Factors After Combined Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

Mengyao Zhu, 周慧敏, Ning Zhang, AiGe Yang et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Craniofacial Morphologic Changes and Associated Factors After Combined Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

Mengyao Zhu, 周慧敏, Ning Zhang, AiGe Yang, Yiman Guo, Yan Jin, Anqi Zhang, Shuchang Wang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify craniofacial morphologic changes after combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment in patients with cleft lip and palate and to identify factors associated with horizontal relapse at A point after maxillary advancement. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 186 patients treated from January 2024 to January 2026. Cephalograms were analyzed at presurgical baseline (T0), within 1 week after surgery (T1), and at the last follow-up at least 6 months after surgery (T2). Horizontal relapse at A point was defined as posterior displacement of A point from T1 to T2 on an SN-based coordinate system after cranial-base superimposition. Measurement reliability was assessed in 30 randomly selected patients. Paired analyses quantified T0-to-T2 morphologic change, and multivariable models evaluated relapse magnitude and relapse of 2 mm or greater. RESULTS: The mean age was 20.7 years, 54.8% were male, and the mean follow-up was 14.7 months. From T0 to T2, SNA increased by 4.93 degrees, ANB by 7.12 degrees, Wits appraisal by 6.56 mm, and facial convexity by 8.82 degrees. The mean horizontal relapse at A point was 2.74 mm (95% CI, 2.60-2.89); 150 patients (80.6%) had a relapse of 2 mm or greater. Larger advancement, higher scar score, bilateral cleft phenotype, and segmental maxillary osteotomy were associated with greater relapse. Patient-specific fixation and concurrent bone grafting were associated with lower relapse, but these associations should be interpreted as noncausal. CONCLUSION: Combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment was associated with sagittal skeletal and profile improvement. Relapse at A point was measurable and was associated with movement magnitude, cleft phenotype, scarring, segmentation, fixation, and bony support. A clear definition of radiographic timing and coordinate-based relapse measurement is essential for interpreting stability after cleft orthognathic surgery.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon