Relational Objective Emergent Morality

This essay develops Relational Objective Emergent Morality (ROEM), an account of morality grounded in Actual individuals, their intrinsic forms of mattering, and the relations through which their lives and goal-directed activities affect one another. Moral reality emerges as these individuals’ purposes, dependencies, constraints, and possibilities meet in concrete circumstances. It is not produced by social agreement alone or imposed by a fixed code; its claims must be assessed in light of the individuals and relations they concern. Because individuals and their circumstances change, moral understanding must remain open to criticism and revision. ROEM treats moral inquiry as a fallible, historically situated process. As individuals develop and new possibilities emerge, new forms of mattering and moral dilemmas arise. Moral progress can be uneven and locally reversed, while the persistence and continued development of agents and knowledge make further progress possible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652726
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Relational Objective Emergent Morality

Sadia Naeem
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
preprint

Relational Objective Emergent Morality

Sadia Naeem
preprint en

Abstract

This essay develops Relational Objective Emergent Morality (ROEM), an account of morality grounded in Actual individuals, their intrinsic forms of mattering, and the relations through which their lives and goal-directed activities affect one another. Moral reality emerges as these individuals’ purposes, dependencies, constraints, and possibilities meet in concrete circumstances. It is not produced by social agreement alone or imposed by a fixed code; its claims must be assessed in light of the individuals and relations they concern. Because individuals and their circumstances change, moral understanding must remain open to criticism and revision. ROEM treats moral inquiry as a fallible, historically situated process. As individuals develop and new possibilities emerge, new forms of mattering and moral dilemmas arise. Moral progress can be uneven and locally reversed, while the persistence and continued development of agents and knowledge make further progress possible.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon