Judge v. generative artificial intelligence v. hybrid: The public trusts and accepts human and hybrid more than generative-artificial-intelligence-based judicial decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000683
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judge v. generative artificial intelligence v. hybrid: The public trusts and accepts human and hybrid more than generative-artificial-intelligence-based judicial decision-making.

Friederike Funk, Marvin Walczok
Law and Human Behavior
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Judge v. generative artificial intelligence v. hybrid: The public trusts and accepts human and hybrid more than generative-artificial-intelligence-based judicial decision-making.

Friederike Funk, Marvin Walczok
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Law and Human Behavior
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Bayerisches Forschungsinstitut für Digitale Transformation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Judge v. generative artificial intelligence v. hybrid: The public trusts and accepts human and hybrid more than generative-artificial-intelligence-based judicial decision-making. — Friederike Funk, Marvin Walczok · Law and Human Behavior (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS