Turns, Twists, & Expanding Spirals, The Society for Music Theory (SMT), 1977–2027

How might one weave a story of ideas and commitments, individuals and communities, in characterizing the Society for Music Theory 1977–2027? At the beginning, we were an intergenerational group, “coming of age” in the late 1970s and early 1980s with the varied imaginations of musicians—composers, performers, teachers and graduate students, thinkers and writers—sharing passionate persuasions and debates on ideas conceptual, practical-techné, analytical-theoretical, and instructional. Ours were idealistic manifestos of possibility, potential, and disciplinary integrity. What would the political, historical, and aesthetic import at this crossroads portend for its past, present, and future identities? Musicians, writers, teachers, and scholars have offered eloquent, insightful, and stimulating historically reflective and varied accounts of the Society for Music Theory within its 1977 to 2027 span, such as those by Steven Rings, Stephen Lett, Sumanth Gopinath, Leigh VanHandel, and Judith Lochhead.1 Perceptions and conceptions are rooted in specific times and modes of thinking, description, and engagement. We have spoken in critique and in celebration––here in this essay, I write in first person—about subjective and intersubjective encounters that remain contextual, intertextual, and fluid.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Music Theory Spectrum
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mts/mtag017
Primary Topic
Musicology and Musical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turns, Twists, & Expanding Spirals, The Society for Music Theory (SMT), 1977–2027

Marianne Kielian‐Gilbert
Music Theory Spectrum
Musicology and Musical Analysis
article

Turns, Twists, & Expanding Spirals, The Society for Music Theory (SMT), 1977–2027

Marianne Kielian‐Gilbert
article en

Abstract

How might one weave a story of ideas and commitments, individuals and communities, in characterizing the Society for Music Theory 1977–2027? At the beginning, we were an intergenerational group, “coming of age” in the late 1970s and early 1980s with the varied imaginations of musicians—composers, performers, teachers and graduate students, thinkers and writers—sharing passionate persuasions and debates on ideas conceptual, practical-techné, analytical-theoretical, and instructional. Ours were idealistic manifestos of possibility, potential, and disciplinary integrity. What would the political, historical, and aesthetic import at this crossroads portend for its past, present, and future identities? Musicians, writers, teachers, and scholars have offered eloquent, insightful, and stimulating historically reflective and varied accounts of the Society for Music Theory within its 1977 to 2027 span, such as those by Steven Rings, Stephen Lett, Sumanth Gopinath, Leigh VanHandel, and Judith Lochhead.1 Perceptions and conceptions are rooted in specific times and modes of thinking, description, and engagement. We have spoken in critique and in celebration––here in this essay, I write in first person—about subjective and intersubjective encounters that remain contextual, intertextual, and fluid.

Music Theory Spectrum
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Musicology and Musical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon