Health policy effects of budgetary actions under the second Trump administration

We analyze the impact of the second Trump administration's budgetary actions on policies affecting health. Using the Social Determinants of Health framework, we review executive actions, including funding freezes and rescissions, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. We conclude that these measures weakened federal capacity, public health infrastructure, education, scientific research, global health programs, and environmental protections. Medicaid, Affordable Care Act policies, family planning, and food assistance face reduced eligibility, greater administrative burdens, and substantial funding cuts, while funding grows for immigration and carceral policies that damage health. Noncitizens, low-income communities, racial and ethnic minorities, disabled people, and rural populations will bear disproportionate harms. State and local governments may mitigate some effects, but fiscal, legal, political, and institutional constraints limit them. Rebuilding federal health policy will require more than restoring previous funding; policymakers must design stronger, resilient institutions suited to damaged institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2026.101670
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health policy effects of budgetary actions under the second Trump administration

Scott L. Greer, Miranda Yaver, Xie Rachel Kulikoff, Holly Jarman
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Health policy effects of budgetary actions under the second Trump administration

Scott L. Greer, Miranda Yaver, Xie Rachel Kulikoff, Holly Jarman
article en

Abstract

We analyze the impact of the second Trump administration's budgetary actions on policies affecting health. Using the Social Determinants of Health framework, we review executive actions, including funding freezes and rescissions, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. We conclude that these measures weakened federal capacity, public health infrastructure, education, scientific research, global health programs, and environmental protections. Medicaid, Affordable Care Act policies, family planning, and food assistance face reduced eligibility, greater administrative burdens, and substantial funding cuts, while funding grows for immigration and carceral policies that damage health. Noncitizens, low-income communities, racial and ethnic minorities, disabled people, and rural populations will bear disproportionate harms. State and local governments may mitigate some effects, but fiscal, legal, political, and institutional constraints limit them. Rebuilding federal health policy will require more than restoring previous funding; policymakers must design stronger, resilient institutions suited to damaged institutions.

The Lancet Regional Health - AmericasVol. 65
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), University of Michigan (US), Department of Health (TW), Department of Health Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon