Evaluating the implementation of One Health in surveillance systems: the case of the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS)

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the integration of One Health (OH) principles to better monitor the occurrence of zoonotic infectious agents and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, the added value of applying the OH approach to surveillance programs has rarely been formally evaluated, making it difficult to identify and document best practices. The aim of this study was to assess OH integration within the Canadian Integrated Program for Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS), a national surveillance program established in Canada in 2002 to monitor antimicrobial use (AMU) and AMR along the food chain. Two evaluation tools were used: (1) the OH-ness assessment tool of the Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) framework and, (2) the Evaluation of Collaboration for Surveillance (EcoSur). Data were collected using desktop review, group discussions ( n = 2) and complementary individual interviews ( n = 9) with CIPARS team members. The results were shared and validated by the participants. The OH-ness index from the NEOH tool was 0.53, suggesting a moderate integration of OH principles overall. Both infrastructural and operational dimensions scored between 0.6 and 0.8, demonstrating an efficient conceptualization of the program to meet its objectives as well as effective teamwork. However, the assessment revealed a lack of integration of different disciplines within the core team and of the environment component in surveillance activities. Scores from the ECoSur tool were higher for the quality of collaboration between sectors for operations (82%) than for management (68%) and support (65%). The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of CIPARS and can help inform the implementation of similar surveillance models for AMR and infectious diseases. The application of two evaluation tools also demonstrated their distinctiveness, complementarity, and capacity to evaluate aspects specifically relevant to OH integrated surveillance programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
One Health Outlook
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-026-00247-y
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the implementation of One Health in surveillance systems: the case of the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS)

Thomas G. Poder, Hélène Carabin, Sarah Mediouni, Cécile Aenishaenslin et al.
One Health Outlook
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Evaluating the implementation of One Health in surveillance systems: the case of the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS)

Thomas G. Poder, Hélène Carabin, Sarah Mediouni, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Jane E. Parmley
article en

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the integration of One Health (OH) principles to better monitor the occurrence of zoonotic infectious agents and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, the added value of applying the OH approach to surveillance programs has rarely been formally evaluated, making it difficult to identify and document best practices. The aim of this study was to assess OH integration within the Canadian Integrated Program for Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS), a national surveillance program established in Canada in 2002 to monitor antimicrobial use (AMU) and AMR along the food chain. Two evaluation tools were used: (1) the OH-ness assessment tool of the Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) framework and, (2) the Evaluation of Collaboration for Surveillance (EcoSur). Data were collected using desktop review, group discussions ( n = 2) and complementary individual interviews ( n = 9) with CIPARS team members. The results were shared and validated by the participants. The OH-ness index from the NEOH tool was 0.53, suggesting a moderate integration of OH principles overall. Both infrastructural and operational dimensions scored between 0.6 and 0.8, demonstrating an efficient conceptualization of the program to meet its objectives as well as effective teamwork. However, the assessment revealed a lack of integration of different disciplines within the core team and of the environment component in surveillance activities. Scores from the ECoSur tool were higher for the quality of collaboration between sectors for operations (82%) than for management (68%) and support (65%). The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of CIPARS and can help inform the implementation of similar surveillance models for AMR and infectious diseases. The application of two evaluation tools also demonstrated their distinctiveness, complementarity, and capacity to evaluate aspects specifically relevant to OH integrated surveillance programs.

One Health Outlook
Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA), Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Université Laval (CA), Ontario Veterinary College (CA), Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CA), Centre de recherche en santé publique (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon