Chokepoints and value capture: China’s electrical and optical sector in the global value chain under geopolitical risk

Using the 2020 and 2024 multiregional input-output tables at constant prices, we examine China’s position in the electrical and optical equipment (E&E) value chain and its exposure to hypothetical decoupling. China’s share of world E&E output declines from 42.2% to 40.4%, while the domestic value-added share of its exports falls from 75.9% to 71.9% and its GVC position moves further downstream. Japan, the Republic of Korea, Taipei, China, and the United States jointly account for 67.7% of foreign E&E value added embodied in China’s E&E exports in both years. Under unchanged final demand, extracting selected E&E linkages produces broadly comparable percentage output reductions in the receiving E&E sectors for most bilateral pairs, with effects extending to third economies. These findings highlight persistent sourcing concentration and production interdependence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia and the Global Economy
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2026.100152
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chokepoints and value capture: China’s electrical and optical sector in the global value chain under geopolitical risk

Chen Chen Yong, Xun REN
Asia and the Global Economy
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Chokepoints and value capture: China’s electrical and optical sector in the global value chain under geopolitical risk

Chen Chen Yong, Xun REN
article en

Abstract

Using the 2020 and 2024 multiregional input-output tables at constant prices, we examine China’s position in the electrical and optical equipment (E&E) value chain and its exposure to hypothetical decoupling. China’s share of world E&E output declines from 42.2% to 40.4%, while the domestic value-added share of its exports falls from 75.9% to 71.9% and its GVC position moves further downstream. Japan, the Republic of Korea, Taipei, China, and the United States jointly account for 67.7% of foreign E&E value added embodied in China’s E&E exports in both years. Under unchanged final demand, extracting selected E&E linkages produces broadly comparable percentage output reductions in the receiving E&E sectors for most bilateral pairs, with effects extending to third economies. These findings highlight persistent sourcing concentration and production interdependence.

Asia and the Global EconomyVol. 6(2)
University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon