“Nobody Wants a Trailer That Had Dead Bodies in It”: A Descriptive Study of the Ethics of Public Sector Deathcare

Death is all around, yet more research is needed to understand it is a critical public management function especially at the local level of government. Medical examiners and coroners are public servants guided by science and jurisdictional rules, yet get caught in a swirl of empathy, politics, and resource constraints when acting as citizen-state agents. Using interview data with 18 medical examiners, coroners, and deathcare leaders throughout the US, this article finds that: ethical leadership guides decision making; neutral competence and professional standards are used yet sometimes challenged; and personal conduct in the face of internal and external pressure remains key to accountability. Findings are not meant to generalize but rather give insight into public servants dealing with socially and politically challenging topics and how they exercise decision-making abilities within these situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Quarterly
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07349149261495968
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Nobody Wants a Trailer That Had Dead Bodies in It”: A Descriptive Study of the Ethics of Public Sector Deathcare

Staci M. Zavattaro
Public Administration Quarterly
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

“Nobody Wants a Trailer That Had Dead Bodies in It”: A Descriptive Study of the Ethics of Public Sector Deathcare

Staci M. Zavattaro
article en

Abstract

Death is all around, yet more research is needed to understand it is a critical public management function especially at the local level of government. Medical examiners and coroners are public servants guided by science and jurisdictional rules, yet get caught in a swirl of empathy, politics, and resource constraints when acting as citizen-state agents. Using interview data with 18 medical examiners, coroners, and deathcare leaders throughout the US, this article finds that: ethical leadership guides decision making; neutral competence and professional standards are used yet sometimes challenged; and personal conduct in the face of internal and external pressure remains key to accountability. Findings are not meant to generalize but rather give insight into public servants dealing with socially and politically challenging topics and how they exercise decision-making abilities within these situations.

Public Administration Quarterly
University of Central Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
“Nobody Wants a Trailer That Had Dead Bodies in It”: A Descriptive Study of the Ethics of Public Sector Deathcare — Staci M. Zavattaro · Public Administration Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS