The illusion of fair selection: barriers to accessing selective education for the disadvantaged in England

Underrepresentation of disadvantaged students in selective schools attracts global attention. Presenting evidence from England, this study reveals that barriers in accessing selective education exist before selection, as disadvantaged students have a reduced chance of both attending and passing selection tests, even if they have the same level of academic performance. This underrepresentation cannot be fully explained by attainment, implying that disadvantaged families might be reluctant or have difficulties in engaging with selective school applications. However, our simulation also shows that, while conversion to an opt-out system would boost the proportion of disadvantaged students in selective schools, the effect is small (increases from 7.8% to 12%). Our findings thus demonstrate that there are fundamental challenges to equity in selective systems which cannot be substantially attenuated with changes in the selection process or compensatory policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2026.2746539
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The illusion of fair selection: barriers to accessing selective education for the disadvantaged in England

Binwei Lu, Jake Anders, Xin Shao, Joanne Bartley
British Journal of Sociology of Education
School Choice and Performance
article

The illusion of fair selection: barriers to accessing selective education for the disadvantaged in England

Binwei Lu, Jake Anders, Xin Shao, Joanne Bartley
article en

Abstract

Underrepresentation of disadvantaged students in selective schools attracts global attention. Presenting evidence from England, this study reveals that barriers in accessing selective education exist before selection, as disadvantaged students have a reduced chance of both attending and passing selection tests, even if they have the same level of academic performance. This underrepresentation cannot be fully explained by attainment, implying that disadvantaged families might be reluctant or have difficulties in engaging with selective school applications. However, our simulation also shows that, while conversion to an opt-out system would boost the proportion of disadvantaged students in selective schools, the effect is small (increases from 7.8% to 12%). Our findings thus demonstrate that there are fundamental challenges to equity in selective systems which cannot be substantially attenuated with changes in the selection process or compensatory policies.

British Journal of Sociology of Education
University College London (GB), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The illusion of fair selection: barriers to accessing selective education for the disadvantaged in England — Binwei Lu, Jake Anders, et al. · British Journal of Sociology of Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS