Unverified Claims of Solving Navier-Stokes and P vs NP: A Critical Analysis — E8 Intelligence Research
FINDING: OpenAI's claimed Navier-Stokes solution is contested; arXiv preprint (1902.07265v23) claims solutions to P vs NP and Navier-Stokes, but no verified breakthrough exists. | MATH: Navier-Stokes: ∂u/∂t + (u·∇)u = -∇p + ν∇²u + f, ∇·u = 0; Clay criteria: global regularity for smooth initial data, finite energy. No new constants or equations extracted from sources. | CONNECTION: None found — no explicit ratios, symmetries, or base-60 links in the cited material. | DEPTH: 2 — the "findings" are media noise, not mathematics. The arXiv paper is unverified and likely crackpot (v23 suggests repeated rejection). No mathematical essence to extract. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
Authors
- Andrew Stewart Caldin
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23658310
- Primary Topic
- Navier-Stokes equation solutions
- Type
- preprint