Deep Learning-Based Honey Adulteration Classification: A Comparative Study with Hyperparameter Tuning and Explainable AI

Honey adulterated with cheap sugar syrups continues to threaten consumer confidence in one of the most precious natural products globally. However, methods to detect such fraud can be slow, expensive, or destructive. This study developed an explainable deep-learning framework for distinguishing pure from adulterated honey using two complementary and openly available datasets: a large synthetic physicochemical dataset (D1; 247,903 observations, eight variables) and a visible-near-infrared (Vis-NIR) hyperspectral dataset of real honey samples (D2; 8,675 observations, 128 bands). A one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (Bi-LSTM) were independently optimised for each dataset using Optuna and then evaluated on held-out test data using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. The 1D-CNN outperformed the Bi-LSTM on both modalities. On D1, it reached 98.49% accuracy, an F1-score of 0.9881, and a ROC-AUC of 0.9994, compared with 92.42%, 0.9417, and 0.9832 for the Bi-LSTM; on D2, it reached 99.08% accuracy and a ROC-AUC of 0.9987, compared with 93.16% and 0.9846. SHAP analysis of the physicochemical model ranked pH and colour score as the dominant predictors, followed by density and water content. Two caveats temper these numbers. D1 is synthetically generated; therefore, the D1 results demonstrate that the framework recovers a known nonlinear decision boundary rather than detecting adulteration in real honey. Moreover, all four models were evaluated using internal validation only. Therefore, the framework is best understood as a reproducible, interpretable template for rapid authenticity screening, which requires external validation on independently collected honey spanning a range of botanical origins, adulterant types, and adulteration levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Food Science & Technology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56557/jafsat/2026/v13i411269
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-Based Honey Adulteration Classification: A Comparative Study with Hyperparameter Tuning and Explainable AI

Vijayaram Eyarkai Nambi, Hanuman Anshiram Jadhav, Suragouni Keerthi, Chandrasekar Veerapandian et al.
Journal of Advances in Food Science & Technology
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
article

Deep Learning-Based Honey Adulteration Classification: A Comparative Study with Hyperparameter Tuning and Explainable AI

Vijayaram Eyarkai Nambi, Hanuman Anshiram Jadhav, Suragouni Keerthi, Chandrasekar Veerapandian, S. Kisore
article en

Abstract

Honey adulterated with cheap sugar syrups continues to threaten consumer confidence in one of the most precious natural products globally. However, methods to detect such fraud can be slow, expensive, or destructive. This study developed an explainable deep-learning framework for distinguishing pure from adulterated honey using two complementary and openly available datasets: a large synthetic physicochemical dataset (D1; 247,903 observations, eight variables) and a visible-near-infrared (Vis-NIR) hyperspectral dataset of real honey samples (D2; 8,675 observations, 128 bands). A one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (Bi-LSTM) were independently optimised for each dataset using Optuna and then evaluated on held-out test data using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. The 1D-CNN outperformed the Bi-LSTM on both modalities. On D1, it reached 98.49% accuracy, an F1-score of 0.9881, and a ROC-AUC of 0.9994, compared with 92.42%, 0.9417, and 0.9832 for the Bi-LSTM; on D2, it reached 99.08% accuracy and a ROC-AUC of 0.9987, compared with 93.16% and 0.9846. SHAP analysis of the physicochemical model ranked pH and colour score as the dominant predictors, followed by density and water content. Two caveats temper these numbers. D1 is synthetically generated; therefore, the D1 results demonstrate that the framework recovers a known nonlinear decision boundary rather than detecting adulteration in real honey. Moreover, all four models were evaluated using internal validation only. Therefore, the framework is best understood as a reproducible, interpretable template for rapid authenticity screening, which requires external validation on independently collected honey spanning a range of botanical origins, adulterant types, and adulteration levels.

Journal of Advances in Food Science & TechnologyVol. 13(4)
National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management - Thanjavur (IN), National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (IN), Ministry of Food Processing Industries (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon