Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Image-Guided Aspiration Techniques for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: Image-guided fluid aspiration is a key component in the diagnostic work-up of suspected prosthetic joint infection of the hip (PJI). Fluoroscopy, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) are frequently employed to guide aspiration; however, comparative evidence regarding their diagnostic performance and procedural outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and technical performance of these modalities. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies evaluating fluoroscopy-, US-, or CT-guided hip aspiration to aid PJI diagnosis. Outcomes of interest included diagnostic performance, dry tap rates, and procedural characteristics. Dry tap rates were pooled by modality using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. Due to heterogeneity in reference standards, diagnostic accuracy outcomes were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Ten studies comprising 1,574 hip aspirations were included (647 fluoroscopy, 831 US, 96 CT). Sensitivity ranged from 0.52-0.89 for US and 0.27-0.83 for fluoroscopy, with consistently high specificity (≥0.75) across modalities. CT-guided aspiration demonstrated sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.98 in a single study. Pooled dry tap rates were lower for US (17%, 95% CI 4-30%) compared with fluoroscopy (27%, 95% CI 9-45%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²>97%). CONCLUSIONS: Reported specificity is comparable between ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided hip aspiration for PJI. Ultrasound-guided aspiration demonstrates higher reported sensitivity and lower dry tap rates, although interpretation is limited by heterogeneity in reference standards. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This review provides a focused synthesis of comparative evidence on imaging modalities for hip aspiration in PJI. It highlights a potential diagnostic and practical advantage of ultrasound-guided aspiration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqag257
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Image-Guided Aspiration Techniques for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Systematic Review

Conor James Kilkenny, Iain H. Feeley, Sean Paul Whelehan, Aisling Bracken et al.
British Journal of Radiology
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Image-Guided Aspiration Techniques for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Systematic Review

Conor James Kilkenny, Iain H. Feeley, Sean Paul Whelehan, Aisling Bracken, E Sheehan, K Merghani
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Image-guided fluid aspiration is a key component in the diagnostic work-up of suspected prosthetic joint infection of the hip (PJI). Fluoroscopy, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) are frequently employed to guide aspiration; however, comparative evidence regarding their diagnostic performance and procedural outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and technical performance of these modalities. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies evaluating fluoroscopy-, US-, or CT-guided hip aspiration to aid PJI diagnosis. Outcomes of interest included diagnostic performance, dry tap rates, and procedural characteristics. Dry tap rates were pooled by modality using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. Due to heterogeneity in reference standards, diagnostic accuracy outcomes were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Ten studies comprising 1,574 hip aspirations were included (647 fluoroscopy, 831 US, 96 CT). Sensitivity ranged from 0.52-0.89 for US and 0.27-0.83 for fluoroscopy, with consistently high specificity (≥0.75) across modalities. CT-guided aspiration demonstrated sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.98 in a single study. Pooled dry tap rates were lower for US (17%, 95% CI 4-30%) compared with fluoroscopy (27%, 95% CI 9-45%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²>97%). CONCLUSIONS: Reported specificity is comparable between ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided hip aspiration for PJI. Ultrasound-guided aspiration demonstrates higher reported sensitivity and lower dry tap rates, although interpretation is limited by heterogeneity in reference standards. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This review provides a focused synthesis of comparative evidence on imaging modalities for hip aspiration in PJI. It highlights a potential diagnostic and practical advantage of ultrasound-guided aspiration.

British Journal of Radiology
University College Dublin (IE), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon