Law under Institutionalism

Abstract Legal institutionalism (LI) is an emerging theory and related body of empirical research at the intersection of law and the social sciences, which seeks to move beyond the overnaturalized conceptions of law and the market that have until recently dominated academic and policy discourse, including the “law & economics” paradigm and the theory of “legal origins.” LI operationalizes insights familiar to legal theory, including law’s normativity and scalability as a mode of governance and its role as a locus and source of power in society, for use in those social sciences disciplines that have until recently neglected law as a causal variable. An LI lens reminds us that development is a contingent and contested process, and that it can be a basis for coercion and exploitation as well as for growth. While the “coding” of land as collateral helped pave the way for economic growth in early industrial Britain, the coding of “labour” as service, indenture, and slavery was no less central to the legal construction of empire. Understanding what is at stake in the use of law as an instrument of development may help avoid not just a misreading of history, but recurring policy errors, such as “shock therapy.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Law and Development Review
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2026-0084
Primary Topic
Legal and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Law under Institutionalism

Simon F. Deakin
The Law and Development Review
Legal and Constitutional Studies
article

Law under Institutionalism

Simon F. Deakin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Legal institutionalism (LI) is an emerging theory and related body of empirical research at the intersection of law and the social sciences, which seeks to move beyond the overnaturalized conceptions of law and the market that have until recently dominated academic and policy discourse, including the “law & economics” paradigm and the theory of “legal origins.” LI operationalizes insights familiar to legal theory, including law’s normativity and scalability as a mode of governance and its role as a locus and source of power in society, for use in those social sciences disciplines that have until recently neglected law as a causal variable. An LI lens reminds us that development is a contingent and contested process, and that it can be a basis for coercion and exploitation as well as for growth. While the “coding” of land as collateral helped pave the way for economic growth in early industrial Britain, the coding of “labour” as service, indenture, and slavery was no less central to the legal construction of empire. Understanding what is at stake in the use of law as an instrument of development may help avoid not just a misreading of history, but recurring policy errors, such as “shock therapy.”

The Law and Development Review
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Legal and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Law under Institutionalism — Simon F. Deakin · The Law and Development Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS