From naturals to strivers: How stereotypes in social and moral dimensions change with age to drive children's preference development

Children observe some people succeed through natural talent (naturals), whereas others succeed through sustained effort (strivers). Children's preference for naturals or strivers may influence the people they admire and choose as role models and may have implications for their social judgment and achievement development. However, little is known about how children's preferences for naturals versus strivers develop and the factors that explain these preferences. We examined the development of preferences for naturals versus strivers among 221 Han Chinese children (5.06-11.99 years, 114 girls), as well as associations with external perceptions of naturals and strivers (warmth, competence, and morality) and internal self-cognitions (self-concept and mindset). Results revealed an age-related pattern in children's preferences, with younger children tending to prefer naturals and a preference for strivers observed from ages 7-8 onward. These preferences can be explained by the sociomoral value of effort (viewing strivers as warmer and less likely to free-ride). These results extend previous research on the instrumental value of effort and underscore the distinct roles of external stereotypes and internal self--cognitions in shaping social preferences. This study can inform educators how to understand children's preferences for naturals versus strivers and the sociomoral significance of effort in daily interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacag204
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From naturals to strivers: How stereotypes in social and moral dimensions change with age to drive children's preference development

Y G Wang, Yanfang Li, Zhunapinng, Jie Zhou
Child Development
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

From naturals to strivers: How stereotypes in social and moral dimensions change with age to drive children's preference development

Y G Wang, Yanfang Li, Zhunapinng, Jie Zhou
article en

Abstract

Children observe some people succeed through natural talent (naturals), whereas others succeed through sustained effort (strivers). Children's preference for naturals or strivers may influence the people they admire and choose as role models and may have implications for their social judgment and achievement development. However, little is known about how children's preferences for naturals versus strivers develop and the factors that explain these preferences. We examined the development of preferences for naturals versus strivers among 221 Han Chinese children (5.06-11.99 years, 114 girls), as well as associations with external perceptions of naturals and strivers (warmth, competence, and morality) and internal self-cognitions (self-concept and mindset). Results revealed an age-related pattern in children's preferences, with younger children tending to prefer naturals and a preference for strivers observed from ages 7-8 onward. These preferences can be explained by the sociomoral value of effort (viewing strivers as warmer and less likely to free-ride). These results extend previous research on the instrumental value of effort and underscore the distinct roles of external stereotypes and internal self--cognitions in shaping social preferences. This study can inform educators how to understand children's preferences for naturals versus strivers and the sociomoral significance of effort in daily interactions.

Child Development
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Beijing Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon