Associations Between Perceived Social Support and Subjective and Structural Dimensions of Family Functioning Among Married Mothers of Children Receiving Psychiatric Treatment

BackgroundFamily functioning is closely associated with children's mental health, particularly in child psychiatry settings where caregiving demands are high. Perceived social support is recognized as a protective factor associated with coping processes, yet its relationship with family functioning remains complex and multidimensional.AimsThis study aimed to examine subjective and structural dimensions of family functioning among married mothers accompanying children receiving psychiatric treatment and to explore their associations with perceived social support.MethodThis quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted with 189 married mothers in a child psychiatry clinic in Türkiye. Data were collected using a sociodemographic information form, the Family APGAR Scale, the Family Assessment Device, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Descriptive statistics, bivariate Pearson correlation analyses, multivariate analyses of variance, and univariate between-subjects analyses were performed.ResultsAfter multiple-comparison correction, family support positively correlated with Family APGAR scores and was negatively associated with dysfunction across five dimensions. Total support was associated with Family APGAR scores and three FAD dimensions, while significant-other support was associated with affective responsiveness. No support indicator was associated with behavioral control. Family APGAR total scores showed strong negative associations with several FAD dimensions, although the magnitude varied across domains. The Family APGAR and FAD therefore captured related but non-identical aspects of family functioning, with the former reflecting subjective global perceptions of family functioning and the latter structural and functional processes across specific family domains. Multivariate analyses further indicated that Family APGAR total scores, FAD general functioning, and total perceived social support varied across selected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.ConclusionsThe findings support a multidimensional understanding of family functioning. Family-centered assessment in child psychiatry should consider both subjective perceptions and structural and functional family processes. Because the study was cross-sectional, no conclusions can be drawn regarding temporal, causal, or reciprocal relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640261496537
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Perceived Social Support and Subjective and Structural Dimensions of Family Functioning Among Married Mothers of Children Receiving Psychiatric Treatment

Esra Çöp, Gül KARAHAN, Satı Gül Kapisiz, Aybüke KAPLAN et al.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Associations Between Perceived Social Support and Subjective and Structural Dimensions of Family Functioning Among Married Mothers of Children Receiving Psychiatric Treatment

Esra Çöp, Gül KARAHAN, Satı Gül Kapisiz, Aybüke KAPLAN, Veli Duyan
article en

Abstract

BackgroundFamily functioning is closely associated with children's mental health, particularly in child psychiatry settings where caregiving demands are high. Perceived social support is recognized as a protective factor associated with coping processes, yet its relationship with family functioning remains complex and multidimensional.AimsThis study aimed to examine subjective and structural dimensions of family functioning among married mothers accompanying children receiving psychiatric treatment and to explore their associations with perceived social support.MethodThis quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted with 189 married mothers in a child psychiatry clinic in Türkiye. Data were collected using a sociodemographic information form, the Family APGAR Scale, the Family Assessment Device, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Descriptive statistics, bivariate Pearson correlation analyses, multivariate analyses of variance, and univariate between-subjects analyses were performed.ResultsAfter multiple-comparison correction, family support positively correlated with Family APGAR scores and was negatively associated with dysfunction across five dimensions. Total support was associated with Family APGAR scores and three FAD dimensions, while significant-other support was associated with affective responsiveness. No support indicator was associated with behavioral control. Family APGAR total scores showed strong negative associations with several FAD dimensions, although the magnitude varied across domains. The Family APGAR and FAD therefore captured related but non-identical aspects of family functioning, with the former reflecting subjective global perceptions of family functioning and the latter structural and functional processes across specific family domains. Multivariate analyses further indicated that Family APGAR total scores, FAD general functioning, and total perceived social support varied across selected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.ConclusionsThe findings support a multidimensional understanding of family functioning. Family-centered assessment in child psychiatry should consider both subjective perceptions and structural and functional family processes. Because the study was cross-sectional, no conclusions can be drawn regarding temporal, causal, or reciprocal relationships.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Ankara University (TR), Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR), S.B. Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon