NARRATIVE WARFARE AND MEDIA FRAMING IN THE PAHALGAM INCIDENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIAN, PAKISTANI AND WESTERN MEDIA DISCOURSE

The attack on the city of Pahalgam in 22 April 2025, which resulted in the death of 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, had a dramatic effect on the India–Pakistan relations, leading to a sudden deterioration in the relations between the two countries and finally to armed clashes in May 2025. The study explores the competing narratives created by Indian, Pakistani and western media about the incident and ensuing crisis. The study is based on Framing Theory, Agenda-Setting Theory and the notion of narrative warfare and adopts a qualitative comparative discourse analysis to analyze the source selection, the attribution of responsibility, lexical selection, thematic emphasis, representation of terrorism, national identity, and military and diplomatic reaction. The results show that there are significant differences between the three media environments. The media in India mainly portrayed the issue in terms of national security, terrorism, victimization and threat from Pakistan narratives. The emphasis of the Pakistani media was on denial, uncertainty of facts, Kashmir's political status which is yet to be resolved and fear of possible exploitation by the Indian side. The Western media more often took an attribution-sensitive and de-escalatory tone, focusing on human rights issues, conflicting claims, the Kashmir issue and escalation dangers between the two nuclear nations. The study has shown that news media were not only spatiotemporal platforms for exchanging information but also spaces of contestation and legitimation of narratives and politics, and has added to the field of conflict communication studies, media framing, strategic narratives and studies on security in South Asia.Keywords: Pahalgam incident; narrative warfare; media framing; India–Pakistan relations; Kashmir; strategic narratives; terrorism; conflict communication; discourse analysis; international media, Education, Cognitive Development, Guided Play, Lahore, Pakistan.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Social Sciences
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23664371
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NARRATIVE WARFARE AND MEDIA FRAMING IN THE PAHALGAM INCIDENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIAN, PAKISTANI AND WESTERN MEDIA DISCOURSE

Saman Rukh Khan, Ammara Afzal Siddiqui, Muhammad Huzaifa Bin Salih,Rida Ramzan,Syeda Asma Hussain
Perspectives in Social Sciences
Media Studies and Communication
article

NARRATIVE WARFARE AND MEDIA FRAMING IN THE PAHALGAM INCIDENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIAN, PAKISTANI AND WESTERN MEDIA DISCOURSE

Saman Rukh Khan, Ammara Afzal Siddiqui, Muhammad Huzaifa Bin Salih,Rida Ramzan,Syeda Asma Hussain
article en

Abstract

The attack on the city of Pahalgam in 22 April 2025, which resulted in the death of 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, had a dramatic effect on the India–Pakistan relations, leading to a sudden deterioration in the relations between the two countries and finally to armed clashes in May 2025. The study explores the competing narratives created by Indian, Pakistani and western media about the incident and ensuing crisis. The study is based on Framing Theory, Agenda-Setting Theory and the notion of narrative warfare and adopts a qualitative comparative discourse analysis to analyze the source selection, the attribution of responsibility, lexical selection, thematic emphasis, representation of terrorism, national identity, and military and diplomatic reaction. The results show that there are significant differences between the three media environments. The media in India mainly portrayed the issue in terms of national security, terrorism, victimization and threat from Pakistan narratives. The emphasis of the Pakistani media was on denial, uncertainty of facts, Kashmir's political status which is yet to be resolved and fear of possible exploitation by the Indian side. The Western media more often took an attribution-sensitive and de-escalatory tone, focusing on human rights issues, conflicting claims, the Kashmir issue and escalation dangers between the two nuclear nations. The study has shown that news media were not only spatiotemporal platforms for exchanging information but also spaces of contestation and legitimation of narratives and politics, and has added to the field of conflict communication studies, media framing, strategic narratives and studies on security in South Asia.Keywords: Pahalgam incident; narrative warfare; media framing; India–Pakistan relations; Kashmir; strategic narratives; terrorism; conflict communication; discourse analysis; international media, Education, Cognitive Development, Guided Play, Lahore, Pakistan.

Perspectives in Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
NARRATIVE WARFARE AND MEDIA FRAMING IN THE PAHALGAM INCIDENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIAN, PAKISTANI AND WESTERN MEDIA DISCOURSE — Saman Rukh Khan, Ammara Afzal Siddiqui, Muhammad Huzaifa Bin Salih,Rida Ramzan,Syeda Asma Hussain · Perspectives in Social Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS