Identifying Problem-Talk and Co-rumination in Adolescents’ Social Networks

Abstract Co-rumination (excessive problem-talk) is linked to adolescents’ psychosocial well-being. Traditional measures of co-rumination assess co-rumination tendencies with one (unspecified) friend. However, this approach overlooks both the number and characteristics of co-rumination partner(s). The current study identifies problem-talk partners and the degree to which individuals co-ruminate with each partner. The sample includes 579 Finnish adolescents (grades 4–9; M age = 14.05, SD = 1.59; 52.3% self-identified as girl). More than half of adolescents (56%) nominated two or more problem-talk partners. Number of problem-talk partners and co-rumination among problem-talk partners were both associated with friendship closeness/satisfaction, but only co-rumination among problem-talk partners was positively linked to internalizing symptoms. Some evidence was found for a negative association between number of problem-talk partners and internalizing symptoms, underlining the importance of considering the specific ways in which problem-talk partners discuss problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02428-4
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Problem-Talk and Co-rumination in Adolescents’ Social Networks

Jack L. Andrews, Sarah T. Malamut
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Identifying Problem-Talk and Co-rumination in Adolescents’ Social Networks

Jack L. Andrews, Sarah T. Malamut
article en

Abstract

Abstract Co-rumination (excessive problem-talk) is linked to adolescents’ psychosocial well-being. Traditional measures of co-rumination assess co-rumination tendencies with one (unspecified) friend. However, this approach overlooks both the number and characteristics of co-rumination partner(s). The current study identifies problem-talk partners and the degree to which individuals co-ruminate with each partner. The sample includes 579 Finnish adolescents (grades 4–9; M age = 14.05, SD = 1.59; 52.3% self-identified as girl). More than half of adolescents (56%) nominated two or more problem-talk partners. Number of problem-talk partners and co-rumination among problem-talk partners were both associated with friendship closeness/satisfaction, but only co-rumination among problem-talk partners was positively linked to internalizing symptoms. Some evidence was found for a negative association between number of problem-talk partners and internalizing symptoms, underlining the importance of considering the specific ways in which problem-talk partners discuss problems.

Journal of Youth and Adolescence
University of Turku (FI), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon