Architecting agents for collaborative air combat using a team-centered design aproach

Abstract The United States Air Force seeks to develop “Collaborative Combat Aircraft” to provide an affordable force multiplier. Current Artificial Intelligence (AI) research efforts often focus on developing the AI necessary to support task work within target domains without sufficiently considering integration in existing systems, including the capabilities necessary to enable the teamwork required to enable human-AI teams. The current research employs a recently published team-oriented analysis and design method, referred to as Agent-Oriented Systems Modeling (AOSM), to provide an architecture-level analysis of the human-AI team to establish requirements for the AI systems in both manned and unmanned aircraft. The approach is applied to an F-16 formation performing defensive counter air, to evaluate task and teamwork requirements within the analogous system. These requirements, namely the goals, responsibilities, and capabilities of the agents in the existing system are then applied to envision the “To-Be” system to ensure equivalent or greater capabilities exist in the proposed architecture. This analysis produces numerous traceable findings that can be applied to establish system level requirements for future development to ensure effective human-AI teaming, including 45 capabilities required of the system and five agent roles to be fulfilled in the “To-Be” system. The project discusses and supports the importance of efficient communication and coordination mechanisms for all AI agents when teaming with the human pilot.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human-Intelligent Systems Integration
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-026-00115-0
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architecting agents for collaborative air combat using a team-centered design aproach

Michael E. Miller, Kip E. Johnson, Micah H. Treptau
Human-Intelligent Systems Integration
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

Architecting agents for collaborative air combat using a team-centered design aproach

Michael E. Miller, Kip E. Johnson, Micah H. Treptau
article en

Abstract

Abstract The United States Air Force seeks to develop “Collaborative Combat Aircraft” to provide an affordable force multiplier. Current Artificial Intelligence (AI) research efforts often focus on developing the AI necessary to support task work within target domains without sufficiently considering integration in existing systems, including the capabilities necessary to enable the teamwork required to enable human-AI teams. The current research employs a recently published team-oriented analysis and design method, referred to as Agent-Oriented Systems Modeling (AOSM), to provide an architecture-level analysis of the human-AI team to establish requirements for the AI systems in both manned and unmanned aircraft. The approach is applied to an F-16 formation performing defensive counter air, to evaluate task and teamwork requirements within the analogous system. These requirements, namely the goals, responsibilities, and capabilities of the agents in the existing system are then applied to envision the “To-Be” system to ensure equivalent or greater capabilities exist in the proposed architecture. This analysis produces numerous traceable findings that can be applied to establish system level requirements for future development to ensure effective human-AI teaming, including 45 capabilities required of the system and five agent roles to be fulfilled in the “To-Be” system. The project discusses and supports the importance of efficient communication and coordination mechanisms for all AI agents when teaming with the human pilot.

Human-Intelligent Systems Integration
U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon