AI and education in African national AI strategies: An analysis of 18 countries

Abstract National artificial intelligence strategies and policies assign education responsibilities both for developing AI capabilities (education for AI) and for adopting AI in educational services (AI for education). This study examines how these responsibilities are articulated and supported in a bounded corpus of 18 African national policy documents. A descriptive qualitative document analysis consolidated 275 evidence records, retaining source passages, locations, working translations, statement types and uncertainty notes. Document-level coding distinguished learning about AI, identifiable educational AI applications and educator preparation; a framework-based thematic synthesis examined delivery arrangements, inclusion and safeguards. Structured AI learning was identified in all 18 documents, named educational AI functions in 12 and educator preparation in 14. These counts include proposed and illustrative measures and do not indicate implementation; restricting them to proposed actions gives 17, 9 and 13. Educational applications ranged from personalised learning and tutoring to student profiling, admissions and credential verification. Supporting arrangements included teacher development, laboratories, scholarships, partnerships, institutional responsibilities and monitoring targets, but these elements were not interchangeable evidence of a complete delivery plan. Counter-examples to any general claim of weak specification included a costed education programme in Mozambique’s draft and proposed algorithmic bias audits covering education in Côte d’Ivoire. The corpus assigns education a dual role in AI development while specifying the connections between reforms, resources and protections unevenly. The contribution is an evidence-linked account of policy design, not a ranking of countries or an assessment of educational outcomes. Keywords: artificial intelligence; education policy; Africa; policy analysis; AI literacy; AI Strategy

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23667215
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and education in African national AI strategies: An analysis of 18 countries

Douglas Mbang Massom
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

AI and education in African national AI strategies: An analysis of 18 countries

Douglas Mbang Massom
article en

Abstract

Abstract National artificial intelligence strategies and policies assign education responsibilities both for developing AI capabilities (education for AI) and for adopting AI in educational services (AI for education). This study examines how these responsibilities are articulated and supported in a bounded corpus of 18 African national policy documents. A descriptive qualitative document analysis consolidated 275 evidence records, retaining source passages, locations, working translations, statement types and uncertainty notes. Document-level coding distinguished learning about AI, identifiable educational AI applications and educator preparation; a framework-based thematic synthesis examined delivery arrangements, inclusion and safeguards. Structured AI learning was identified in all 18 documents, named educational AI functions in 12 and educator preparation in 14. These counts include proposed and illustrative measures and do not indicate implementation; restricting them to proposed actions gives 17, 9 and 13. Educational applications ranged from personalised learning and tutoring to student profiling, admissions and credential verification. Supporting arrangements included teacher development, laboratories, scholarships, partnerships, institutional responsibilities and monitoring targets, but these elements were not interchangeable evidence of a complete delivery plan. Counter-examples to any general claim of weak specification included a costed education programme in Mozambique’s draft and proposed algorithmic bias audits covering education in Côte d’Ivoire. The corpus assigns education a dual role in AI development while specifying the connections between reforms, resources and protections unevenly. The contribution is an evidence-linked account of policy design, not a ranking of countries or an assessment of educational outcomes. Keywords: artificial intelligence; education policy; Africa; policy analysis; AI literacy; AI Strategy

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon