Student partners as methodological critics

The University College Cork (UCC) Centre for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) Pedagogical Partners Project, a student-staff partnership project (SSPP), aimed to increase inclusivity in UCC’s pedagogical practices. Student and teacher partners formed teams, with students observing and providing feedback on teaching. Student partners (SPs) used mid-semester feedback (MSF) to gather student perspectives, promoting inclusion by enabling in-semester improvements. The MSFs achieved impressive engagement from students in the class, generated rich data, and led to productive responses from teacher partners (TPs). However, minority voices were not as successfully platformed as hoped. Using collaborative autoethnography, SPs analysed the efficacy of the MSF tool. Findings indicate student-led facilitation, third-party management, and mid-semester timing drove high engagement. Opportunities to better platform inclusivity-relevant feedback include supporting imagination, more explicit questioning, reduced emphasis on consensus in reporting, and consideration of alternative data analysis approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Students as Partners
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v10i2.7030
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student partners as methodological critics

Bonnie B. Mullinix, A. Coakley, Michael Dowling, Asma Zulfiqar et al.
International Journal for Students as Partners
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Student partners as methodological critics

Bonnie B. Mullinix, A. Coakley, Michael Dowling, Asma Zulfiqar, Anna Santucci, Khalid Alwisi, Chidozie Okorie
article en

Abstract

The University College Cork (UCC) Centre for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) Pedagogical Partners Project, a student-staff partnership project (SSPP), aimed to increase inclusivity in UCC’s pedagogical practices. Student and teacher partners formed teams, with students observing and providing feedback on teaching. Student partners (SPs) used mid-semester feedback (MSF) to gather student perspectives, promoting inclusion by enabling in-semester improvements. The MSFs achieved impressive engagement from students in the class, generated rich data, and led to productive responses from teacher partners (TPs). However, minority voices were not as successfully platformed as hoped. Using collaborative autoethnography, SPs analysed the efficacy of the MSF tool. Findings indicate student-led facilitation, third-party management, and mid-semester timing drove high engagement. Opportunities to better platform inclusivity-relevant feedback include supporting imagination, more explicit questioning, reduced emphasis on consensus in reporting, and consideration of alternative data analysis approaches.

International Journal for Students as PartnersVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Student partners as methodological critics — Bonnie B. Mullinix, A. Coakley, et al. · International Journal for Students as Partners (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS