Practical Imagining: A Roundtable Discussion on Imagining the Divine and the Implications for Practice

This roundtable discussion brings together a panel of scholars to unearth and examine shared concerns and questions across this special edition, focused on God-representations, imagining God and the implications for practice. The conversation considers: the underlying values that form interdisciplinary research; the relationship between God-representations and practices; the significance of interdisciplinarity for reaching seldom-heard populations; the disciplinary goals and limits of psychology and theology; and creativity and affectivity in the future of research. Certain themes also recurred across these discussions, which map the disciplinary distinctiveness of theology and psychology while speaking to shared concerns with power, underlying epistemologies and the (ultimate) significance of the research. These reflections bring the practical importance of research on God-representations into sharp relief. Not only do God-representations interact with cosmologies, actions, identities and so on, the discourse about those representations (and how they interact with practical concerns), shapes our research practice too. The intersection of psychology and theology offers an imaginative and practical model for good practice in interdisciplinary research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychology and Theology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00916471261487985
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Imagining: A Roundtable Discussion on Imagining the Divine and the Implications for Practice

Tobias Tanton, Keith Dow, Carissa A. Sharp, Pavlína Kašparová et al.
Journal of Psychology and Theology
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Practical Imagining: A Roundtable Discussion on Imagining the Divine and the Implications for Practice

Tobias Tanton, Keith Dow, Carissa A. Sharp, Pavlína Kašparová, Shoko Watanabe, Amy Daughton, Lynne M. Taylor, Elżbieta Łazarewicz-Wyrzykowska
article en

Abstract

This roundtable discussion brings together a panel of scholars to unearth and examine shared concerns and questions across this special edition, focused on God-representations, imagining God and the implications for practice. The conversation considers: the underlying values that form interdisciplinary research; the relationship between God-representations and practices; the significance of interdisciplinarity for reaching seldom-heard populations; the disciplinary goals and limits of psychology and theology; and creativity and affectivity in the future of research. Certain themes also recurred across these discussions, which map the disciplinary distinctiveness of theology and psychology while speaking to shared concerns with power, underlying epistemologies and the (ultimate) significance of the research. These reflections bring the practical importance of research on God-representations into sharp relief. Not only do God-representations interact with cosmologies, actions, identities and so on, the discourse about those representations (and how they interact with practical concerns), shapes our research practice too. The intersection of psychology and theology offers an imaginative and practical model for good practice in interdisciplinary research.

Journal of Psychology and Theology
Tohoku University (JP), University of Cambridge (GB), Faraday Institute for Science and Religion (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
John Templeton Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon