Examination of personal data protection regimes in developing countries: comparative study of Malaysia, Pakistan and Bangladesh with reference to GDPR

Purpose This study aims to examine and compare the personal data protection regimes of Malaysia, Pakistan and Bangladesh with the aim of identifying regulatory strengths, weaknesses and emerging trends in developing country approaches to privacy governance with reference to global data protection standards, particularly the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, analyzing statutory frameworks, draft legislation and regulatory structures in the three jurisdictions. The comparison focuses on scope, individual rights, regulatory independence and enforcement mechanisms. Findings The analysis demonstrates that while all three jurisdictions reflect increasing convergence with international data protection principles, significant structural deficiencies remain. Malaysia’s regime is limited in scope to commercial transactions and excludes state actors. Pakistan’s framework is more expansive but remains unimplemented and institutionally uncertain. Bangladesh’s proposed legislation suffers from definitional ambiguity and extensive executive control. Compared with the GDPR, all three regimes exhibit weaknesses in accountability, regulatory independence and enforceability. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on three selected developing jurisdictions and relies primarily on doctrinal analysis of legislative frameworks and policy documents. Future research may expand the comparative scope to include additional developing and developed jurisdictions and evaluate the practical implementation of these laws following enactment. Practical implications The findings provide guidance for policymakers, regulators and legislators seeking to strengthen data protection governance in developing countries. This study highlights the importance of independent supervisory authorities, comprehensive data subject rights, effective enforcement mechanisms and clear limitations on governmental exemptions. Social implications As digital economies continue to expand, effective data protection frameworks play a crucial role in safeguarding individual privacy, enhancing public trust in digital governance and promoting responsible data-driven innovation. Strengthening legal protections for personal data contributes to greater accountability, transparency and protection of fundamental rights in the digital age. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by providing a systematic comparative analysis of three developing-country regimes at different stages of legislative evolution and by evaluating them against internationally recognized data protection standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Management
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-08-2025-0376
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of personal data protection regimes in developing countries: comparative study of Malaysia, Pakistan and Bangladesh with reference to GDPR

Mohammad Belayet Hossain, Ridoan Karim, Yasir Aleem, Muhammad Abdullah Fazi
International Journal of Law and Management
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Examination of personal data protection regimes in developing countries: comparative study of Malaysia, Pakistan and Bangladesh with reference to GDPR

Mohammad Belayet Hossain, Ridoan Karim, Yasir Aleem, Muhammad Abdullah Fazi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine and compare the personal data protection regimes of Malaysia, Pakistan and Bangladesh with the aim of identifying regulatory strengths, weaknesses and emerging trends in developing country approaches to privacy governance with reference to global data protection standards, particularly the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, analyzing statutory frameworks, draft legislation and regulatory structures in the three jurisdictions. The comparison focuses on scope, individual rights, regulatory independence and enforcement mechanisms. Findings The analysis demonstrates that while all three jurisdictions reflect increasing convergence with international data protection principles, significant structural deficiencies remain. Malaysia’s regime is limited in scope to commercial transactions and excludes state actors. Pakistan’s framework is more expansive but remains unimplemented and institutionally uncertain. Bangladesh’s proposed legislation suffers from definitional ambiguity and extensive executive control. Compared with the GDPR, all three regimes exhibit weaknesses in accountability, regulatory independence and enforceability. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on three selected developing jurisdictions and relies primarily on doctrinal analysis of legislative frameworks and policy documents. Future research may expand the comparative scope to include additional developing and developed jurisdictions and evaluate the practical implementation of these laws following enactment. Practical implications The findings provide guidance for policymakers, regulators and legislators seeking to strengthen data protection governance in developing countries. This study highlights the importance of independent supervisory authorities, comprehensive data subject rights, effective enforcement mechanisms and clear limitations on governmental exemptions. Social implications As digital economies continue to expand, effective data protection frameworks play a crucial role in safeguarding individual privacy, enhancing public trust in digital governance and promoting responsible data-driven innovation. Strengthening legal protections for personal data contributes to greater accountability, transparency and protection of fundamental rights in the digital age. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by providing a systematic comparative analysis of three developing-country regimes at different stages of legislative evolution and by evaluating them against internationally recognized data protection standards.

International Journal of Law and Management
Monash University Malaysia (MY), University of Sargodha (PK), Curtin University (AU), Taylor's University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon