CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND TAX AVOIDANCE REGULATION: A TWO-WAY INTERPLAY

Abstract Corporate social responsibility, increasingly framed through environmental, social and governance practices, remains under-integrated within corporate taxation. This article analyses the two-way interplay between responsibility norms and the legal regulation of tax avoidance. It argues that responsibility is neither wholly extra-legal nor purely voluntary, while tax law alone is constrained by definitional indeterminacy, limits of legal design and enforcement, structural arbitrage opportunities, business lobbying and weaknesses in public accountability. Responsibility norms can strengthen tax governance and transparency; legal rules can, in turn, discipline responsibility initiatives through disclosure and accountability. Their interaction provides a more credible framework for constraining aggressive avoidance and strengthening corporate accountability in taxation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cambridge Law Journal
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197326101779
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND TAX AVOIDANCE REGULATION: A TWO-WAY INTERPLAY

Xu Yan
The Cambridge Law Journal
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND TAX AVOIDANCE REGULATION: A TWO-WAY INTERPLAY

Xu Yan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Corporate social responsibility, increasingly framed through environmental, social and governance practices, remains under-integrated within corporate taxation. This article analyses the two-way interplay between responsibility norms and the legal regulation of tax avoidance. It argues that responsibility is neither wholly extra-legal nor purely voluntary, while tax law alone is constrained by definitional indeterminacy, limits of legal design and enforcement, structural arbitrage opportunities, business lobbying and weaknesses in public accountability. Responsibility norms can strengthen tax governance and transparency; legal rules can, in turn, discipline responsibility initiatives through disclosure and accountability. Their interaction provides a more credible framework for constraining aggressive avoidance and strengthening corporate accountability in taxation.

The Cambridge Law Journal
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon