Oral Maintenance Anti-Hypertensives for Severe Systolic Hypertension: A Controlled Before and After Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVE: A systolic blood pressure (SBP) threshold  160 mmHg is used in pregnancy for acute anti-hypertensive treatment; however, this was initially adapted from expert opinion and guidelines for non-pregnant adults support a SBP  180 mmHg. We compared adverse maternal outcomes using a SBP threshold of  180 mmHg versus  160 mmHg for acute anti-hypertensive treatment, while treating SBPs between 160-179 mmHg (DBP  110 mmHg) with oral maintenance anti-hypertensives. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a Quality Improvement before and after non-inferiority study (NCT05881252) of singletons  20 weeks' with SBP  160 mmHg at a single Level 4 medical center. In the before group, acute antihypertensives (intravenous [IV] labetalol/hydralazine or rapid-acting oral nifedipine) were given for persistent SBP  160 mmHg (or DBP  110 mmHg). In the after group, oral maintenance antihypertensives (labetalol or extended-release nifedipine) were given if persistent SBP between 160-179 mmHg (DBP  110 mmHg) and acute antihypertensives for persistent SBP  180 mmHg (or DBP  110 mmHg). The primary outcome was a composite of congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, cerebrovascular accident, acute kidney injury, or myocardial infarction. Bayesian analysis was performed using a non-inferiority margin of 4% and 1% (posthoc sensitivity analysis). RESULTS: We studied 1,002 individuals (410 in before; 592 in after) with severe hypertension. The primary outcome occurred in 2.9% of the before and 1.9% of the after group (0.72 median relative risk, 95% credible interval 0.36-1.46) with an 82% probability of risk reduction in the after group and > 99.9% probability that the risk difference in the after group was < 4% (99% for a 1% margin). Use of acute antihypertensives per individual treated decreased almost 3-fold in the after group (mean 1.7 doses versus 0.6, p<0.01) Conclusion: In our population, treating SBPs between 160-180 mmHg with oral maintenance antihypertensives resulted in to a non-inferior rate of maternal adverse outcomes and decreased the use of.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2989-1511
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Maintenance Anti-Hypertensives for Severe Systolic Hypertension: A Controlled Before and After Quality Improvement Study

Christopher Cortes, Anthony Chartier, Suneet P. Chauhan, Kristen A. Cagino et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Oral Maintenance Anti-Hypertensives for Severe Systolic Hypertension: A Controlled Before and After Quality Improvement Study

Christopher Cortes, Anthony Chartier, Suneet P. Chauhan, Kristen A. Cagino, Claudia Pedroza, Emily Hyde, Hector Mendez‐Figueroa, Beverly Red, Cabrina I. Becker, Sean C. Blackwell, Baha M. Sibai, Chenyue Huang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A systolic blood pressure (SBP) threshold  160 mmHg is used in pregnancy for acute anti-hypertensive treatment; however, this was initially adapted from expert opinion and guidelines for non-pregnant adults support a SBP  180 mmHg. We compared adverse maternal outcomes using a SBP threshold of  180 mmHg versus  160 mmHg for acute anti-hypertensive treatment, while treating SBPs between 160-179 mmHg (DBP  110 mmHg) with oral maintenance anti-hypertensives. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a Quality Improvement before and after non-inferiority study (NCT05881252) of singletons  20 weeks' with SBP  160 mmHg at a single Level 4 medical center. In the before group, acute antihypertensives (intravenous [IV] labetalol/hydralazine or rapid-acting oral nifedipine) were given for persistent SBP  160 mmHg (or DBP  110 mmHg). In the after group, oral maintenance antihypertensives (labetalol or extended-release nifedipine) were given if persistent SBP between 160-179 mmHg (DBP  110 mmHg) and acute antihypertensives for persistent SBP  180 mmHg (or DBP  110 mmHg). The primary outcome was a composite of congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, cerebrovascular accident, acute kidney injury, or myocardial infarction. Bayesian analysis was performed using a non-inferiority margin of 4% and 1% (posthoc sensitivity analysis). RESULTS: We studied 1,002 individuals (410 in before; 592 in after) with severe hypertension. The primary outcome occurred in 2.9% of the before and 1.9% of the after group (0.72 median relative risk, 95% credible interval 0.36-1.46) with an 82% probability of risk reduction in the after group and > 99.9% probability that the risk difference in the after group was < 4% (99% for a 1% margin). Use of acute antihypertensives per individual treated decreased almost 3-fold in the after group (mean 1.7 doses versus 0.6, p<0.01) Conclusion: In our population, treating SBPs between 160-180 mmHg with oral maintenance antihypertensives resulted in to a non-inferior rate of maternal adverse outcomes and decreased the use of.

American Journal of Perinatology
The University of Texas System (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon