Estimating the incidence and duration of diagnostic delays for measles

OBJECTIVE: Although measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, cases have increased in recent years. Our goal was to estimate the incidence and duration of diagnostic delays for measles and identify factors associated with delays. DESIGN: Case-crossover. SETTING: We used the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (2001-2023). PATIENTS: We identified measles cases and evaluated prior healthcare encounters for potential missed diagnostic opportunities. METHODS: Using a bootstrapping approach, we estimated the number of healthcare visits representing possible missed opportunities to diagnose measles during a two-week period preceding the index diagnosis. We utilized Firth logistic regression to assess factors associated with delays. RESULTS: We identified 4,651 measles cases. During the two-week period prior to diagnosis, 426 (9.2%) patients had healthcare visits with signs or symptoms commonly associated with measles. We estimated 381 (95%CI: 330-440) missed opportunities to diagnose measles. Delays occurred most frequently in outpatient settings (81.0%). Approximately 6.9% (95%CI: 6.1-8.0%) of patients experienced at least one missed opportunity, with a mean delay of 4.05 days (95%CI: 3.48-4.51) (median delay = 2.94 days [95%CI: 2.00-3.00]). An estimated 1.7% (95%CI: 1.1-2.2%) of patients experienced a diagnostic delay lasting a week or longer. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of delays included age <2 years and receiving antibiotic prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic delays for measles are not uncommon and may facilitate transmission, especially in outpatient settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10393
Primary Topic
Virology and Viral Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the incidence and duration of diagnostic delays for measles

Philip M. Polgreen, Aaron C. Miller, Alan T. Arakkal, Joseph E. Cavanaugh et al.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Virology and Viral Diseases
article

Estimating the incidence and duration of diagnostic delays for measles

Philip M. Polgreen, Aaron C. Miller, Alan T. Arakkal, Joseph E. Cavanaugh, Loreen A. Herwaldt
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, cases have increased in recent years. Our goal was to estimate the incidence and duration of diagnostic delays for measles and identify factors associated with delays. DESIGN: Case-crossover. SETTING: We used the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (2001-2023). PATIENTS: We identified measles cases and evaluated prior healthcare encounters for potential missed diagnostic opportunities. METHODS: Using a bootstrapping approach, we estimated the number of healthcare visits representing possible missed opportunities to diagnose measles during a two-week period preceding the index diagnosis. We utilized Firth logistic regression to assess factors associated with delays. RESULTS: We identified 4,651 measles cases. During the two-week period prior to diagnosis, 426 (9.2%) patients had healthcare visits with signs or symptoms commonly associated with measles. We estimated 381 (95%CI: 330-440) missed opportunities to diagnose measles. Delays occurred most frequently in outpatient settings (81.0%). Approximately 6.9% (95%CI: 6.1-8.0%) of patients experienced at least one missed opportunity, with a mean delay of 4.05 days (95%CI: 3.48-4.51) (median delay = 2.94 days [95%CI: 2.00-3.00]). An estimated 1.7% (95%CI: 1.1-2.2%) of patients experienced a diagnostic delay lasting a week or longer. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of delays included age <2 years and receiving antibiotic prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic delays for measles are not uncommon and may facilitate transmission, especially in outpatient settings.

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Virology and Viral Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Estimating the incidence and duration of diagnostic delays for measles — Philip M. Polgreen, Aaron C. Miller, et al. · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS