The patient’s perspective in the pharmaceutical regulatory and access pathway: considerations and recommendations from the 2025 Patient Forum

Introduction: Despite the growing attention on Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and Patient-Reported Experience (PRE), their use for drugs approval and, especially, price and reimbursement is still limited. The present paper illustrates the discussion and recommendations of three interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder Working Groups (WGs) on this topic.Method: The discussion, oriented by a report from the coordinators, focused on the role of PRO in the comparative evaluation of efficacy and risk, of PRE as an expression of preference for the drugs value components and of PRO and PRE in the regulatory process and national and regional access.Results: The results are reported as reflections and recommendations on the three topics.Conclusions: There is widespread consensus on the need to enhance the use of PRO and PRE, provided that (i) methodological and operational issues are addressed, (ii) PRO and PRE role in the regulatory and access process is clarified, (iii) representatives of patients and institutions are involved in a more structured way (iv) the actual role played in decision-making is clarified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2026.3833
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The patient’s perspective in the pharmaceutical regulatory and access pathway: considerations and recommendations from the 2025 Patient Forum

Massimo Di Maïo, Oriana Ciani, Giuliano Buzzetti, Massimo Medaglia et al.
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

The patient’s perspective in the pharmaceutical regulatory and access pathway: considerations and recommendations from the 2025 Patient Forum

Massimo Di Maïo, Oriana Ciani, Giuliano Buzzetti, Massimo Medaglia, Annalisa Maddalena Scopinaro, Elisabetta Iannelli, Cosetta Bianchi, Rosy Amodeo, Andrea Marcellusi, Viviana Ruggieri, Francesco Damele, Maria Cristina Carena, Claudio Jommi, Giorgia Fedele, Anna Lisa Mandorino, Antonella Di Lorenzo, Fabio Amanti
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the growing attention on Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and Patient-Reported Experience (PRE), their use for drugs approval and, especially, price and reimbursement is still limited. The present paper illustrates the discussion and recommendations of three interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder Working Groups (WGs) on this topic.Method: The discussion, oriented by a report from the coordinators, focused on the role of PRO in the comparative evaluation of efficacy and risk, of PRE as an expression of preference for the drugs value components and of PRO and PRE in the regulatory process and national and regional access.Results: The results are reported as reflections and recommendations on the three topics.Conclusions: There is widespread consensus on the need to enhance the use of PRO and PRE, provided that (i) methodological and operational issues are addressed, (ii) PRO and PRE role in the regulatory and access process is clarified, (iii) representatives of patients and institutions are involved in a more structured way (iv) the actual role played in decision-making is clarified.

Global & Regional Health Technology AssessmentVol. 13(1)
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), Astellas Pharma (Japan) (JP), University of Milan (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Parent Project Onlus (IT), Sanofi (Italy) (IT), University of Turin (IT), Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon