Access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments: an interview study on in-hospital practices and policies and moral perspectives of hospital executives in the Netherlands

Anti-cancer treatments that have entered the market are not always immediately covered by basic health insurance in countries with publicly funded healthcare systems. This confronts hospital executives with ethical dilemmas, for instance whether to use hospital budgets to pay for non-reimbursed treatments or allow patients to pay for treatments out of pocket. To our knowledge, no empirical research has been conducted on in-hospital policies regarding non-reimbursed treatments in countries with publicly funded healthcare systems. This study examines policies and practices regarding access to non-reimbursed treatments in hospitals across the Netherlands, and the moral perspectives of hospital executives. A qualitative research approach was chosen. Interviews were carried out with hospital directors, board members, hospital managers and heads of departments in the Netherlands ( N = 17), and thematically analyzed. Respondents expressed concerns regarding the rising costs of newly approved anti-cancer treatments and healthcare costs in general. While in some hospitals, treatments were occasionally paid for using hospital budgets, in other hospitals, this did not occur. In some hospitals, respondents actively assisted physicians in finding alternatives ways of gaining access to non-reimbursed treatments. In other hospitals, access to non-reimbursed treatments was not facilitated. In general hospitals, patients were often referred to academic hospitals if relevant treatments were not (yet) reimbursed. While respondents had differing views on out-of-pocket payments, most respondents supported a strong egalitarian ethos that places high value on equal access. Practices, policies and hospital executives’ perspectives on access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments vary amongst hospitals in the Netherlands. This might lead to variability in access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments among Dutch patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15941-w
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments: an interview study on in-hospital practices and policies and moral perspectives of hospital executives in the Netherlands

Eline Maria Bunnik, Charlotte H C Bomhof, Jilles Smids
BMC Health Services Research
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments: an interview study on in-hospital practices and policies and moral perspectives of hospital executives in the Netherlands

Eline Maria Bunnik, Charlotte H C Bomhof, Jilles Smids
article en

Abstract

Anti-cancer treatments that have entered the market are not always immediately covered by basic health insurance in countries with publicly funded healthcare systems. This confronts hospital executives with ethical dilemmas, for instance whether to use hospital budgets to pay for non-reimbursed treatments or allow patients to pay for treatments out of pocket. To our knowledge, no empirical research has been conducted on in-hospital policies regarding non-reimbursed treatments in countries with publicly funded healthcare systems. This study examines policies and practices regarding access to non-reimbursed treatments in hospitals across the Netherlands, and the moral perspectives of hospital executives. A qualitative research approach was chosen. Interviews were carried out with hospital directors, board members, hospital managers and heads of departments in the Netherlands ( N = 17), and thematically analyzed. Respondents expressed concerns regarding the rising costs of newly approved anti-cancer treatments and healthcare costs in general. While in some hospitals, treatments were occasionally paid for using hospital budgets, in other hospitals, this did not occur. In some hospitals, respondents actively assisted physicians in finding alternatives ways of gaining access to non-reimbursed treatments. In other hospitals, access to non-reimbursed treatments was not facilitated. In general hospitals, patients were often referred to academic hospitals if relevant treatments were not (yet) reimbursed. While respondents had differing views on out-of-pocket payments, most respondents supported a strong egalitarian ethos that places high value on equal access. Practices, policies and hospital executives’ perspectives on access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments vary amongst hospitals in the Netherlands. This might lead to variability in access to non-reimbursed anti-cancer treatments among Dutch patients.

BMC Health Services Research
Erasmus MC (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon