Generative Adversarial Network Augmentation of Whole-Blood Raman Spectra for Breast-Cancer Classification: A PCA–LDA and Patient-Aware Validation Study

Background: Whole-blood Raman spectroscopy provides a label-free molecular fingerprint with potential for breast-cancer classification, but limited sample sizes and substantial biological variability can restrict model generalization. This study evaluated whether generative adversarial network (GAN) augmentation could improve PCA–LDA classification while preserving patient-independent evaluation. Methods: Whole-blood Raman spectra from breast-cancer patients and healthy controls across Stages I–III were analysed using PCA–LDA under four data-composition scenarios: RealOnly, Real25, Real50 and Real100, corresponding to 0%, 25%, 50% and 100% synthetic augmentation. Vanilla GAN and conditional GAN (cGAN) data were evaluated using SpectrumKFold, SubjectKFold and leave-one-patient-out cross-validation (LOPOCV). Classification performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, F1-score, MCC and ROC-AUC, with spectral correspondence and prediction confidence additionally examined. Results: Spectrum-level validation frequently produced near-perfect discrimination, whereas patient-aware validation produced more conservative performance, demonstrating the influence of inter-patient variability. GAN augmentation generally improved sensitivity, balanced accuracy, F1-score and MCC, with the largest benefits observed for the more challenging patient-aware settings. cGAN generally produced greater improvements than vanilla GAN and frequently achieved strong performance at lower augmentation levels. Under LOPOCV, for example, Stage II sensitivity increased from 79.09% with real data alone to 87.32% with 25% cGAN augmentation, while Stage III sensitivity increased from 75.23% to 82.98%. Stage III remained the most challenging setting, with RealOnly LOPOCV AUC of 0.9521 compared with 0.9918 for Stage II. Conclusion: GAN-based augmentation can strengthen PCA–LDA classification of whole-blood Raman spectra, particularly for patient-aware detection of breast-cancer spectra. cGAN showed greater augmentation efficiency than vanilla GAN in several settings. However, the small number of patients within individual stages and absence of independent external validation limit generalizability. Larger multicentre datasets and external validation are required before clinical applicability can be established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2026/v28i11971
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Adversarial Network Augmentation of Whole-Blood Raman Spectra for Breast-Cancer Classification: A PCA–LDA and Patient-Aware Validation Study

John Githaiga, Ruth W. Ndung'u, Brian O. Mairura
Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
article

Generative Adversarial Network Augmentation of Whole-Blood Raman Spectra for Breast-Cancer Classification: A PCA–LDA and Patient-Aware Validation Study

John Githaiga, Ruth W. Ndung'u, Brian O. Mairura
article en

Abstract

Background: Whole-blood Raman spectroscopy provides a label-free molecular fingerprint with potential for breast-cancer classification, but limited sample sizes and substantial biological variability can restrict model generalization. This study evaluated whether generative adversarial network (GAN) augmentation could improve PCA–LDA classification while preserving patient-independent evaluation. Methods: Whole-blood Raman spectra from breast-cancer patients and healthy controls across Stages I–III were analysed using PCA–LDA under four data-composition scenarios: RealOnly, Real25, Real50 and Real100, corresponding to 0%, 25%, 50% and 100% synthetic augmentation. Vanilla GAN and conditional GAN (cGAN) data were evaluated using SpectrumKFold, SubjectKFold and leave-one-patient-out cross-validation (LOPOCV). Classification performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, F1-score, MCC and ROC-AUC, with spectral correspondence and prediction confidence additionally examined. Results: Spectrum-level validation frequently produced near-perfect discrimination, whereas patient-aware validation produced more conservative performance, demonstrating the influence of inter-patient variability. GAN augmentation generally improved sensitivity, balanced accuracy, F1-score and MCC, with the largest benefits observed for the more challenging patient-aware settings. cGAN generally produced greater improvements than vanilla GAN and frequently achieved strong performance at lower augmentation levels. Under LOPOCV, for example, Stage II sensitivity increased from 79.09% with real data alone to 87.32% with 25% cGAN augmentation, while Stage III sensitivity increased from 75.23% to 82.98%. Stage III remained the most challenging setting, with RealOnly LOPOCV AUC of 0.9521 compared with 0.9918 for Stage II. Conclusion: GAN-based augmentation can strengthen PCA–LDA classification of whole-blood Raman spectra, particularly for patient-aware detection of breast-cancer spectra. cGAN showed greater augmentation efficiency than vanilla GAN in several settings. However, the small number of patients within individual stages and absence of independent external validation limit generalizability. Larger multicentre datasets and external validation are required before clinical applicability can be established.

Asian Journal of Probability and StatisticsVol. 28(11)
University of Nairobi (KE), Tharaka University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon