From the P2SK Law to its amendment

This study examines the legal politics of financial-services supervision in Indonesia across Law No. 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority (OJK), Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening, and its 2026 amendment. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, it analyzes Constitutional Court Decisions No. 59/PUU-XXI/2023 and No. 85/PUU-XXII/2024, legislative materials, and official supervisory reports. The analysis identifies three phases: institution-building in 2011; expansion of regulatory and enforcement powers in 2023; and recalibration in 2026 through shared investigative authority, sector-specific restorative justice, an expanded supervisory perimeter, and parliamentary performance evaluation. The article develops an accountable-independence framework drawing on international standards for financial supervisors. It argues that accountability is legitimate when it concerns transparent reporting, aggregate performance, governance, and use of resources, but becomes problematic when binding recommendations or prior legislative approval can influence technical supervisory decisions or individual enforcement cases. The constitutional position of Bank Indonesia requires separate consideration under Article 23D of the 1945 Constitution, while OJK’s institutional design must be read alongside its statutory mandate and the constitutional economic framework. OJK data for 2024 illustrate supervisory activity but do not establish a causal improvement attributable to the 2023 law because comparable pre-2023 time-series data were not analyzed. The study concludes that the 2026 amendment reflects both constitutional correction and broader policy choices extending beyond the judgments that prompted legislative action. Sustainable supervision therefore requires clear competence allocation, transparent and meaningful legislative processes, judicial review, and safeguards against political interference in individual technical decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Administration and Social Science
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v6i5.2460
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the P2SK Law to its amendment

Theresia Septrina Tobing
3 links
Journal of Law Administration and Social Science
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

From the P2SK Law to its amendment

Theresia Septrina Tobing
article en

Abstract

This study examines the legal politics of financial-services supervision in Indonesia across Law No. 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority (OJK), Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening, and its 2026 amendment. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, it analyzes Constitutional Court Decisions No. 59/PUU-XXI/2023 and No. 85/PUU-XXII/2024, legislative materials, and official supervisory reports. The analysis identifies three phases: institution-building in 2011; expansion of regulatory and enforcement powers in 2023; and recalibration in 2026 through shared investigative authority, sector-specific restorative justice, an expanded supervisory perimeter, and parliamentary performance evaluation. The article develops an accountable-independence framework drawing on international standards for financial supervisors. It argues that accountability is legitimate when it concerns transparent reporting, aggregate performance, governance, and use of resources, but becomes problematic when binding recommendations or prior legislative approval can influence technical supervisory decisions or individual enforcement cases. The constitutional position of Bank Indonesia requires separate consideration under Article 23D of the 1945 Constitution, while OJK’s institutional design must be read alongside its statutory mandate and the constitutional economic framework. OJK data for 2024 illustrate supervisory activity but do not establish a causal improvement attributable to the 2023 law because comparable pre-2023 time-series data were not analyzed. The study concludes that the 2026 amendment reflects both constitutional correction and broader policy choices extending beyond the judgments that prompted legislative action. Sustainable supervision therefore requires clear competence allocation, transparent and meaningful legislative processes, judicial review, and safeguards against political interference in individual technical decisions.

Journal of Law Administration and Social ScienceVol. 6(5)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
From the P2SK Law to its amendment — Theresia Septrina Tobing · Journal of Law Administration and Social Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS