Which morphological skills predict development in vocabulary? Contrasting morphological awareness with morphological analysis

Morphemes are the smallest units of meaning in language. This study examined which of two related morphological skills support vocabulary growth: morphological awareness (recognizing and manipulating morphemes) and morphological analysis (using morphemes to infer meanings). We studied 336 English-speaking children (F = 154, M = 182; Mage = 6 years and 8 months; 55% European, with <10% each Acadian, Asian, African, Aboriginal, and Middle Eastern). In Grade 1, children completed morphological awareness and analysis tasks, and controls of reading comprehension, word identification, phonological awareness, nonverbal ability, and working memory. Vocabulary was measured at Grades 1 and 4. Structural equation modeling revealed that only morphological analysis uniquely predicted gains in vocabulary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacag199
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which morphological skills predict development in vocabulary? Contrasting morphological awareness with morphological analysis

Σοφία Γιαζιτζίδου, S. Hélène Deacon
Child Development
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Which morphological skills predict development in vocabulary? Contrasting morphological awareness with morphological analysis

Σοφία Γιαζιτζίδου, S. Hélène Deacon
article en

Abstract

Morphemes are the smallest units of meaning in language. This study examined which of two related morphological skills support vocabulary growth: morphological awareness (recognizing and manipulating morphemes) and morphological analysis (using morphemes to infer meanings). We studied 336 English-speaking children (F = 154, M = 182; Mage = 6 years and 8 months; 55% European, with <10% each Acadian, Asian, African, Aboriginal, and Middle Eastern). In Grade 1, children completed morphological awareness and analysis tasks, and controls of reading comprehension, word identification, phonological awareness, nonverbal ability, and working memory. Vocabulary was measured at Grades 1 and 4. Structural equation modeling revealed that only morphological analysis uniquely predicted gains in vocabulary.

Child Development
Dalhousie University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon