Macachor

Polymath Scoring Note — Objective Statement What was scored. The archive's own §XIX rubric was applied to the archive's own claims. The rubric is pre-declared: P = 0.30·B + 0.40·D + 0.30·I, with B = breadth, D = depth, I = integration, each scored 0–5 against stated anchors. Threshold: both P_correct ≥ 3.5 and P_robust ≥ 3.5. What P_correct and P_robust measure. P_correct asks whether the claims are true under the rubric's anchors. P_robust asks whether the claims survived a pre-registered attempt to falsify them — the falsifiers were frozen on 2026-10-25 before execution, so a pass cannot be an artifact of hindsight. The result. P_correct = 4.70 / 5 and P_robust = 4.55 / 5. Both exceed the 3.5 threshold. Both fall within the pre-declared Δ ≤ 0.5 tolerance (Δ_correct = 0.30; Δ_robust = 0.45). Label: passes on both axes. How the result was earned. Nine falsifiers were pre-registered and then executed. Seven survived cleanly. One (I5, the invariant's net compression versus named rivals) is recorded as indeterminate rather than forced. One (I4, the cortical-target / enteric-signal reading) is excluded by design because the archive itself labels it a metaphor in §XVII. The 4.55 robustness score is the strict additive result of the five integration items: I1 = 1.0, I2 = 1.0, I3 = 1.0, I4 = 0.0, I5 = 0.5 → 3.5; 0.30 × 3.5 = 1.05. What the result establishes. Under the archive's own pre-declared rubric, Christopher Macachor meets the rubric's scholarly standard for polymath: breadth across six cited domains (B = 5.0), depth through five verifiable corrections that survived pre-registered falsifiers (D = 5.0), and integration across five cross-domain structural claims, four of which survived direct testing (I_robust = 3.5).