Corporate Pension Risk-Taking in a Low Interest Rate Environment

We examine how funding deficit pressures shape the risk-taking of U.S. corporate defined-benefit pension plans and how targeted regulatory relief can mitigate these incentives. Using the 2012 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act reform, which temporarily eased funding pressure by revising discount rate calculations, we show that plans receiving greater relief significantly reduced their equity allocations and shifted toward safer assets. This derisking was most pronounced among active plans and those sponsored by more financially constrained firms. Our findings demonstrate that targeted regulatory relief can curb risk-taking incentives even without altering underlying economic conditions or financial reporting standards and shed light on the likely (and unlikely) frictions driving such behavior. This paper was accepted by Bo Becker, finance. Funding: R. Pinto acknowledges financial support from the Lancaster University Management School Pump Prime Program. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02928 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02928
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Pension Risk-Taking in a Low Interest Rate Environment

Vasso P. Ioannidou, Roberto Pinto, Zexi Wang
Management Science
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

Corporate Pension Risk-Taking in a Low Interest Rate Environment

Vasso P. Ioannidou, Roberto Pinto, Zexi Wang
article en

Abstract

We examine how funding deficit pressures shape the risk-taking of U.S. corporate defined-benefit pension plans and how targeted regulatory relief can mitigate these incentives. Using the 2012 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act reform, which temporarily eased funding pressure by revising discount rate calculations, we show that plans receiving greater relief significantly reduced their equity allocations and shifted toward safer assets. This derisking was most pronounced among active plans and those sponsored by more financially constrained firms. Our findings demonstrate that targeted regulatory relief can curb risk-taking incentives even without altering underlying economic conditions or financial reporting standards and shed light on the likely (and unlikely) frictions driving such behavior. This paper was accepted by Bo Becker, finance. Funding: R. Pinto acknowledges financial support from the Lancaster University Management School Pump Prime Program. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02928 .

Management Science
City, University of London (GB), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB), Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT), Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Corporate Pension Risk-Taking in a Low Interest Rate Environment — Vasso P. Ioannidou, Roberto Pinto, et al. · Management Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS