A Robust Deterministic Data Splitting Method for Model Validation

Random sampling is commonly used for creating a testing set for the purpose of model validation. Deterministic methods exist for data splitting that reduce the variability in the random splitting. Although more consistent conclusions can be obtained using deterministic methods, we point out that they can fail when there are certain structures in the data. In particular, this can happen when the testing points are too close to the training points. In this article, we propose a new deterministic method that maximizes the separation between the training and testing points, but at the same time maintains their distribution. Our simulations using several test functions and datasets show that the proposed method is a robust alternative to random splitting and leave-one-out cross-validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2026.2754089
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Robust Deterministic Data Splitting Method for Model Validation

V. Roshan Joseph, Youngseo Cho
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

A Robust Deterministic Data Splitting Method for Model Validation

V. Roshan Joseph, Youngseo Cho
article en

Abstract

Random sampling is commonly used for creating a testing set for the purpose of model validation. Deterministic methods exist for data splitting that reduce the variability in the random splitting. Although more consistent conclusions can be obtained using deterministic methods, we point out that they can fail when there are certain structures in the data. In particular, this can happen when the testing points are too close to the training points. In this article, we propose a new deterministic method that maximizes the separation between the training and testing points, but at the same time maintains their distribution. Our simulations using several test functions and datasets show that the proposed method is a robust alternative to random splitting and leave-one-out cross-validation.

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon