Time to jump: Exploring the distribution of noise in evidence accumulation as a function of time pressure

The diffusion model conceptualizes binary decisions as emerging from continuous evidence accumulation with Gaussian noise. The Lévy-flight model (LFM) extends this by allowing accumulation noise to follow a heavier-tailed distribution, enabling sudden, large jumps in evidence accumulation. The heavy-tailedness is governed by the stability parameter α, with smaller α-values indicating more frequent and larger jumps. We demonstrate through simulation that the LFM can generate near-symmetrical response time (RT) distributions typical under strict deadlines. In Study 1, we explored the influence of intense time pressure on α in a letter-number discrimination task, expecting higher time pressure to entail smaller α-values. Participants (N = 341) were assigned to an accuracy (unlimited RT), implicit deadline (feedback discouraging RTs over 500 ms), or explicit deadline condition (timeout at 500 ms). Given the LFM's intractable likelihood, we used BayesFlow, a framework for simulation-based inference with deep learning. Model comparisons consistently favored the LFM over diffusion model variants-even in the accuracy condition. Importantly, α-values decreased with increasing time pressure and were especially low in the explicit deadline condition, where RT distributions also approached symmetry. Estimating both the LFM and a structurally matched diffusion model, with and without timeout modeling, further showed that accounting for timeout-related RT truncation led to substantially lower diffusion model drift rates, whereas LFM drift rates changed only modestly. Study 2 (N = 160) replicated α's sensitivity to time pressure in a brightness discrimination task. Overall, α responded systematically to temporal constraints across both tasks and timeout modeling specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2026.101836
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time to jump: Exploring the distribution of noise in evidence accumulation as a function of time pressure

Lasse Elsemüller, Mischa von Krause, Veronika Lerche, Eva Marie Hunsmann et al.
Cognitive Psychology
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Time to jump: Exploring the distribution of noise in evidence accumulation as a function of time pressure

Lasse Elsemüller, Mischa von Krause, Veronika Lerche, Eva Marie Hunsmann, Julia Vanessa Liss
article en

Abstract

The diffusion model conceptualizes binary decisions as emerging from continuous evidence accumulation with Gaussian noise. The Lévy-flight model (LFM) extends this by allowing accumulation noise to follow a heavier-tailed distribution, enabling sudden, large jumps in evidence accumulation. The heavy-tailedness is governed by the stability parameter α, with smaller α-values indicating more frequent and larger jumps. We demonstrate through simulation that the LFM can generate near-symmetrical response time (RT) distributions typical under strict deadlines. In Study 1, we explored the influence of intense time pressure on α in a letter-number discrimination task, expecting higher time pressure to entail smaller α-values. Participants (N = 341) were assigned to an accuracy (unlimited RT), implicit deadline (feedback discouraging RTs over 500 ms), or explicit deadline condition (timeout at 500 ms). Given the LFM's intractable likelihood, we used BayesFlow, a framework for simulation-based inference with deep learning. Model comparisons consistently favored the LFM over diffusion model variants-even in the accuracy condition. Importantly, α-values decreased with increasing time pressure and were especially low in the explicit deadline condition, where RT distributions also approached symmetry. Estimating both the LFM and a structurally matched diffusion model, with and without timeout modeling, further showed that accounting for timeout-related RT truncation led to substantially lower diffusion model drift rates, whereas LFM drift rates changed only modestly. Study 2 (N = 160) replicated α's sensitivity to time pressure in a brightness discrimination task. Overall, α responded systematically to temporal constraints across both tasks and timeout modeling specifications.

Cognitive PsychologyVol. 167
University of Mannheim (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE), Clinical Research Center Kiel (DE), Heidelberg University (US)
Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon