RESEARCH NOTE 28 - XIX-C OTP - TRIAS POLITICA 3.0: MODEL-LEARNING CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

RESEARCH NOTE 28 — XIX-C OTP - TRIAS POLITICA 3.0: MODEL-LEARNING CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT This research note examines the historical development of the differentiation of political powers and introduces TRIAS POLITICA 3.0 as a field-based model for studying constitutional development. Its central methodological proposition is: TRIAS POLITICA 3.0 MODEL-LEARNS THE DEVELOPMENT. MODEL-LEARNINGₒ designates the scientific activity through which unfolding constitutional configurations become readable in their differentiated positions, competences, responsibilities, institutional relationships and constitutive actions. The research traces selected historical developments from classical political thought and early modern constitutionalism to contemporary democratic institutions and international criminal justice. The distinctions TRIAS POLITICA 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 are employed as provisional analytical readings rather than established historical periodisations. Particular attention is given to the independent judicial third instance and its KRINEINₒ: the capacity to discern, juridically qualify and decide within its assigned competence. The note further examines DIALOGUE >< ENDOLOGUE, distinguishing dialogue between conflict parties from the constitutive institutional presence of the competent judicial third instance. The contemporary configuration ICC >< FERP — BOTH IN DEVELOPMENT provides an exploratory field for investigating the differentiated development of international judicial competence and DOWN-TOP political representation. Throughout this investigation, FIELD CORRECTIONₒ remains operative, allowing the model's readings and formulations to develop with the encountered field. The research contributes to the continuing development of FESS/FHESS methodology and examines the relationship between scientific model-learning, constitutional differentiation and the emerging political representation project of the Field Endopolitical Representation Party (FERP).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23654001
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESEARCH NOTE 28 - XIX-C OTP - TRIAS POLITICA 3.0: MODEL-LEARNING CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Guido Ulens
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

RESEARCH NOTE 28 - XIX-C OTP - TRIAS POLITICA 3.0: MODEL-LEARNING CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Guido Ulens
article en

Abstract

RESEARCH NOTE 28 — XIX-C OTP - TRIAS POLITICA 3.0: MODEL-LEARNING CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT This research note examines the historical development of the differentiation of political powers and introduces TRIAS POLITICA 3.0 as a field-based model for studying constitutional development. Its central methodological proposition is: TRIAS POLITICA 3.0 MODEL-LEARNS THE DEVELOPMENT. MODEL-LEARNINGₒ designates the scientific activity through which unfolding constitutional configurations become readable in their differentiated positions, competences, responsibilities, institutional relationships and constitutive actions. The research traces selected historical developments from classical political thought and early modern constitutionalism to contemporary democratic institutions and international criminal justice. The distinctions TRIAS POLITICA 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 are employed as provisional analytical readings rather than established historical periodisations. Particular attention is given to the independent judicial third instance and its KRINEINₒ: the capacity to discern, juridically qualify and decide within its assigned competence. The note further examines DIALOGUE >< ENDOLOGUE, distinguishing dialogue between conflict parties from the constitutive institutional presence of the competent judicial third instance. The contemporary configuration ICC >< FERP — BOTH IN DEVELOPMENT provides an exploratory field for investigating the differentiated development of international judicial competence and DOWN-TOP political representation. Throughout this investigation, FIELD CORRECTIONₒ remains operative, allowing the model's readings and formulations to develop with the encountered field. The research contributes to the continuing development of FESS/FHESS methodology and examines the relationship between scientific model-learning, constitutional differentiation and the emerging political representation project of the Field Endopolitical Representation Party (FERP).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon