Chest tube fixation strength depends on suture caliber and fixation technique rather than tube diameter: a biomechanical cadaver study

BACKGROUND: Chest tube dislodgement remains a relevant complication in emergency, trauma, and intensive care medicine. In a previous biomechanical study, the Modified Johannesburg technique using Mersilene USP 1 demonstrated superior fixation strength compared with other chest tube fixation techniques. The present study aimed to determine whether suture size, suture material, and chest tube diameter influence fixation strength. METHODS: A prospective interventional biomechanical cadaveric study was performed using fresh porcine thoracic wall specimens. A total of 320 load-to-failure tests were conducted under standardized laboratory conditions. Two fixation techniques, Modified Johannesburg and Purse String, were compared using two chest tube diameters (20/28 Ch) and four non-absorbable braided suture configurations: Mersilene USP 1, Mersilene USP 2 - 0, Silk USP 1, and Silk USP 2 - 0. Each experimental group consisted of 20 specimens. Specimens were tested in a uniaxial testing machine until construct failure. Force [N] and elongation [mm] at failure were measured. The experiments were videotaped, and the failure mechanism was analyzed. RESULTS: The Modified Johannesburg technique demonstrated significantly higher pull-out forces compared to the Purse String technique (125.0 vs. 66.4 N; p < 0.001), as did larger suture sizes (USP 1 vs. 2 - 0; p < 0.001) and Mersilene compared to Silk (114.6 vs. 76.9 N; p < 0.001). Chest tube size had only a very small and inconsistent effect on pull-out strength. The predominant failure mode was suture rupture (94.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tube fixation strength is significantly influenced by fixation technique, suture size, and suture material. The effect of chest tube diameter on fixation strength appeared negligible. The Modified Johannesburg technique, size 1 sutures, and Mersilene material provided superior biomechanical stability. Since failure occurred predominantly by suture rupture, the suture appears to represent the weakest link of the fixation construct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-026-03369-0
Primary Topic
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chest tube fixation strength depends on suture caliber and fixation technique rather than tube diameter: a biomechanical cadaver study

Stefan Schleifenbaum, Sebastian Krämer, Isabella Metelmann, Tobias Schöbel et al.
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
article

Chest tube fixation strength depends on suture caliber and fixation technique rather than tube diameter: a biomechanical cadaver study

Stefan Schleifenbaum, Sebastian Krämer, Isabella Metelmann, Tobias Schöbel, C. Kleber, Johann Justus Fricke, Ric Meißner
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest tube dislodgement remains a relevant complication in emergency, trauma, and intensive care medicine. In a previous biomechanical study, the Modified Johannesburg technique using Mersilene USP 1 demonstrated superior fixation strength compared with other chest tube fixation techniques. The present study aimed to determine whether suture size, suture material, and chest tube diameter influence fixation strength. METHODS: A prospective interventional biomechanical cadaveric study was performed using fresh porcine thoracic wall specimens. A total of 320 load-to-failure tests were conducted under standardized laboratory conditions. Two fixation techniques, Modified Johannesburg and Purse String, were compared using two chest tube diameters (20/28 Ch) and four non-absorbable braided suture configurations: Mersilene USP 1, Mersilene USP 2 - 0, Silk USP 1, and Silk USP 2 - 0. Each experimental group consisted of 20 specimens. Specimens were tested in a uniaxial testing machine until construct failure. Force [N] and elongation [mm] at failure were measured. The experiments were videotaped, and the failure mechanism was analyzed. RESULTS: The Modified Johannesburg technique demonstrated significantly higher pull-out forces compared to the Purse String technique (125.0 vs. 66.4 N; p < 0.001), as did larger suture sizes (USP 1 vs. 2 - 0; p < 0.001) and Mersilene compared to Silk (114.6 vs. 76.9 N; p < 0.001). Chest tube size had only a very small and inconsistent effect on pull-out strength. The predominant failure mode was suture rupture (94.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tube fixation strength is significantly influenced by fixation technique, suture size, and suture material. The effect of chest tube diameter on fixation strength appeared negligible. The Modified Johannesburg technique, size 1 sutures, and Mersilene material provided superior biomechanical stability. Since failure occurred predominantly by suture rupture, the suture appears to represent the weakest link of the fixation construct.

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryVol. 52(1)
Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology Dresden (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Universität Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon