Comparative longitudinal evaluation of DIMS, progressive addition and single-vision lenses on myopia progression, binocular and visual performance in Spanish children

An 18-month prospective, non-randomized comparative observational study evaluated the effects of different optical corrections on myopia progression, binocular vision, and visual performance in Spanish children. Forty-five myopic participants aged 9-14 years were allocated to single-vision lenses (SV), low-addition progressive addition lenses (PALs), or defocus-incorporated multiple segments lenses (DIMS). Assessments included spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL), comprehensive accommodative function evaluated by measuring amplitude of accommodation, positive and negative relative accommodation, accommodative facility, and accommodative response, and binocular function evaluated by measuring phorias, fusional vergences, and stereopsis. In addition, contrast sensitivity (CS), visual disturbance index (VDI), and subjective visual quality were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. After 18 months, SE progression was -0.59 D for SV, -0.51 D for PALs, and -0.30 D for DIMS, corresponding to a 49% reduction with DIMS compared to SV. AL increased by 0.24, 0.27, and 0.23 millimeters, respectively, although inter-group differences were not significant for AL. Accommodative and binocular functions, visual acuity, CS, and VDI remained stable, while distance stereopsis improved in the DIMS group. These findings suggest an association between DIMS lens wear and reduced myopia progression compared with SV lenses in this cohort, without clinically relevant differences in accommodative or binocular function, visual acuity, or subjective visual quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361471
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative longitudinal evaluation of DIMS, progressive addition and single-vision lenses on myopia progression, binocular and visual performance in Spanish children

Rosario G. Anera, José R. Jiménez, Sonia Ortiz‐Peregrina, Francesco Martino et al.
PLoS ONE
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Comparative longitudinal evaluation of DIMS, progressive addition and single-vision lenses on myopia progression, binocular and visual performance in Spanish children

Rosario G. Anera, José R. Jiménez, Sonia Ortiz‐Peregrina, Francesco Martino, Miriam Carrillo-Pulido, Salvador Solano-Molina
article en

Abstract

An 18-month prospective, non-randomized comparative observational study evaluated the effects of different optical corrections on myopia progression, binocular vision, and visual performance in Spanish children. Forty-five myopic participants aged 9-14 years were allocated to single-vision lenses (SV), low-addition progressive addition lenses (PALs), or defocus-incorporated multiple segments lenses (DIMS). Assessments included spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL), comprehensive accommodative function evaluated by measuring amplitude of accommodation, positive and negative relative accommodation, accommodative facility, and accommodative response, and binocular function evaluated by measuring phorias, fusional vergences, and stereopsis. In addition, contrast sensitivity (CS), visual disturbance index (VDI), and subjective visual quality were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. After 18 months, SE progression was -0.59 D for SV, -0.51 D for PALs, and -0.30 D for DIMS, corresponding to a 49% reduction with DIMS compared to SV. AL increased by 0.24, 0.27, and 0.23 millimeters, respectively, although inter-group differences were not significant for AL. Accommodative and binocular functions, visual acuity, CS, and VDI remained stable, while distance stereopsis improved in the DIMS group. These findings suggest an association between DIMS lens wear and reduced myopia progression compared with SV lenses in this cohort, without clinically relevant differences in accommodative or binocular function, visual acuity, or subjective visual quality.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Hospital de Especialidades (MX)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon