Universal Human Rights or Cultural Relativism? Reassessing the Universality of Human Rights in the Indian Context

Introduction: Human rights are generally understood as rights inherent to every human being by virtue of being human. They are not conceived as privileges granted by the State or as entitlements dependent upon citizenship, social status, nationality, religion, or cultural identity. This conception received its most influential international articulation through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The Declaration proclaimed a common standard of achievement for "all peoples and all nations" and affirmed the inherent dignity and equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family. Its significance lies not merely in enumerating particular civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, but in establishing the idea that certain fundamental standards of human dignity possess universal significance. The claim of universality, however, exists within a world characterized by profound cultural diversity. Human beings live within different religious traditions, customary systems, social structures, moral frameworks, and historical experiences. Concepts concerning individual autonomy, family, community, gender, religion, property, authority, and social responsibility may therefore be understood differently across societies. This creates a fundamental theoretical question: can human rights be genuinely universal while their interpretation and implementation occur within culturally diverse societies? The tension forms the foundation of the debate between universalism and cultural relativism. The universality of human rights is sometimes criticized as reflecting predominantly Western philosophical and political assumptions. Such criticism, however, risks presenting the history of the UDHR as a simple confrontation between a homogeneous "West" and a homogeneous "non-West." The drafting process was considerably more complex. The Commission on Human Rights and its drafting bodies...

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23662579
Primary Topic
Legal Rights and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Universal Human Rights or Cultural Relativism? Reassessing the Universality of Human Rights in the Indian Context

J . SATHVIKA
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Rights and Human Rights
article

Universal Human Rights or Cultural Relativism? Reassessing the Universality of Human Rights in the Indian Context

J . SATHVIKA
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Human rights are generally understood as rights inherent to every human being by virtue of being human. They are not conceived as privileges granted by the State or as entitlements dependent upon citizenship, social status, nationality, religion, or cultural identity. This conception received its most influential international articulation through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The Declaration proclaimed a common standard of achievement for "all peoples and all nations" and affirmed the inherent dignity and equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family. Its significance lies not merely in enumerating particular civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, but in establishing the idea that certain fundamental standards of human dignity possess universal significance. The claim of universality, however, exists within a world characterized by profound cultural diversity. Human beings live within different religious traditions, customary systems, social structures, moral frameworks, and historical experiences. Concepts concerning individual autonomy, family, community, gender, religion, property, authority, and social responsibility may therefore be understood differently across societies. This creates a fundamental theoretical question: can human rights be genuinely universal while their interpretation and implementation occur within culturally diverse societies? The tension forms the foundation of the debate between universalism and cultural relativism. The universality of human rights is sometimes criticized as reflecting predominantly Western philosophical and political assumptions. Such criticism, however, risks presenting the history of the UDHR as a simple confrontation between a homogeneous "West" and a homogeneous "non-West." The drafting process was considerably more complex. The Commission on Human Rights and its drafting bodies...

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal Rights and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon