An energy-centric perspective on safety for physical human-robot interaction under ISO guidelines

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) defines safety as the ability of a robotic system to operate within limits that reduce risks to humans to an acceptable level. However, ISO standards (such as ISO/TS 15066 and ISO 10218–2) contain ambiguities that may lead to inconsistent risk assessments or hazard underestimation. This Perspective Article presents an energy-centric viewpoint on safety in physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). Building on our previous critical review of pHRI safety constraints, the article isolates and explicates one central theme emerging from that analysis: the role of mechanical energy in interpreting ISO/TS 15066 transient-contact limits. Specifically, we discuss how pain-related force limits can be mapped to admissible elastic energy stored in tissue deformation, why the instant of maximum deformation is central for transient-contact assessment, how this interpretation changes under free-recoil and potential-clamp conditions, and why energy-based metrics remain insufficient as standalone descriptors of pain perception or sustained-contact risk. We conclude by outlining open challenges and future research directions for leveraging energy-centered metrics toward safe and effective human-robot interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1901111
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An energy-centric perspective on safety for physical human-robot interaction under ISO guidelines

Stefano Stramigioli, Federico Califano, Riccardo Zanella
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Robot Manipulation and Learning
article

An energy-centric perspective on safety for physical human-robot interaction under ISO guidelines

Stefano Stramigioli, Federico Califano, Riccardo Zanella
article en

Abstract

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) defines safety as the ability of a robotic system to operate within limits that reduce risks to humans to an acceptable level. However, ISO standards (such as ISO/TS 15066 and ISO 10218–2) contain ambiguities that may lead to inconsistent risk assessments or hazard underestimation. This Perspective Article presents an energy-centric viewpoint on safety in physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). Building on our previous critical review of pHRI safety constraints, the article isolates and explicates one central theme emerging from that analysis: the role of mechanical energy in interpreting ISO/TS 15066 transient-contact limits. Specifically, we discuss how pain-related force limits can be mapped to admissible elastic energy stored in tissue deformation, why the instant of maximum deformation is central for transient-contact assessment, how this interpretation changes under free-recoil and potential-clamp conditions, and why energy-based metrics remain insufficient as standalone descriptors of pain perception or sustained-contact risk. We conclude by outlining open challenges and future research directions for leveraging energy-centered metrics toward safe and effective human-robot interaction.

Frontiers in Robotics and AIVol. 13
University of Twente (NL)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon