Legal Aspects of Fintech in India

Fintech has widened the access to payments, credit and investment in India, but its characteristics of speed and anonymity have also enabled rising financial fraud and unauthorized advice. This paper asks whether India's legal framework is equipped enough to adequately protect the consumers on digital financial platforms. Rather than treating Fintech as a single category, it analyses two regulators: the Reserve Bank of India, which governs payments and digital lending, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which governs robo-advisory, algorithmic trading and unregistered "finfluencers". Using a doctrinal methodology of research, it examines statutes, directions, regulations and circulars, alongside fraud data and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. It finds that regulation has followed market development rather than anticipating them, that several activities fit poorly within existing regulatory categories, and that regulation alone, without enforcement, cannot curb fraud without enforcement, awareness and coordination. The most significant gaps between regimes, including fragmented grievance redressal and overlapping breach-reporting duties. The paper recommends closer inter-regulatory coordination and a dedicated robo-advisory framework, proportionate influencer registration and clearer alignment with the DPDP Act.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23662646
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Aspects of Fintech in India

Sumeghna Paul
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Legal Aspects of Fintech in India

Sumeghna Paul
article en

Abstract

Fintech has widened the access to payments, credit and investment in India, but its characteristics of speed and anonymity have also enabled rising financial fraud and unauthorized advice. This paper asks whether India's legal framework is equipped enough to adequately protect the consumers on digital financial platforms. Rather than treating Fintech as a single category, it analyses two regulators: the Reserve Bank of India, which governs payments and digital lending, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which governs robo-advisory, algorithmic trading and unregistered "finfluencers". Using a doctrinal methodology of research, it examines statutes, directions, regulations and circulars, alongside fraud data and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. It finds that regulation has followed market development rather than anticipating them, that several activities fit poorly within existing regulatory categories, and that regulation alone, without enforcement, cannot curb fraud without enforcement, awareness and coordination. The most significant gaps between regimes, including fragmented grievance redressal and overlapping breach-reporting duties. The paper recommends closer inter-regulatory coordination and a dedicated robo-advisory framework, proportionate influencer registration and clearer alignment with the DPDP Act.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
St. Xavier's University Kolkata (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon