Beyond Go/No-Go Decisions: A Regional Selection Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Molecule Screening

In drug discovery, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models are widely used to guide Go/No-Go decisions within the Design–Make–Test–Analyze (DMTA) cycle. However, conventional decision heuristics typically rely on a single cutoff, leading to a rigid binary select/discard paradigm. This approach is particularly ill-suited for borderline compounds near the decision boundary, where screening decisions are especially sensitive to prediction uncertainty and premature choices may either discard viable leads or advance likely failures, thereby increasing downstream assay costs. To address this limitation, we propose Regional Selection (RS), an uncertainty-aware three-way decision framework that partitions compounds into Predicted Pass, Predicted Fail, and Predicted Indeterminate regions. By explicitly reserving high-uncertainty compounds for targeted follow-up, RS avoids the pitfalls of premature binary classification. We formalize this framework through Regional Selection Inference (RSI), which casts region assignment as a multiple-hypothesis testing problem. We develop two imple- mentations of RSI: an empirical calibration-based method (RSI-EC), which thresholds uncertainty-normalized scores via empirical calibration, and a conformal selectionbased method (RSI-CS), which constructs conformal p-values for region assignment. RSI-EC is supported by large-sample calibration arguments, whereas RSI-CS provides finite-sample, distribution-free guarantees under exchangeability. Extensive evaluations across 15 high-dimensional QSAR benchmarks show that both RSI procedures reliably control the false discovery rate while maintaining high screening power. In limited-data regimes, RSI-CS yields particularly stable FDR control, whereas RSI-EC can be slightly less conservative; both perform strongly as sample sizes increase. We further study a cost-aware extension that incorporates asymmetric downstream costs through the score construction while keeping the nominal FDR target fixed. This extension introduces a tuning parameter that can reduce realized downstream cost, with dataset-dependent trade-offs against screening power. Overall, RSI offers a mathematically grounded and resource-aware alternative to single-threshold screening, allowing discovery teams to better balance decision confidence with assay budgets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemRxiv
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15004003/v2
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Beyond Go/No-Go Decisions: A Regional Selection Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Molecule Screening

Kaiqiong Zhao, Eric D. Kolaczyk, Marc‐André Legault, Yue Zhao et al.
ChemRxiv
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
preprint

Beyond Go/No-Go Decisions: A Regional Selection Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Molecule Screening

Kaiqiong Zhao, Eric D. Kolaczyk, Marc‐André Legault, Yue Zhao, Weihua Shi, Tian Bai, Archer Y. Yang, Xiang Yu, Yixuan Li, Hui Peng, Yijie Zhang
preprint en

Abstract

In drug discovery, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models are widely used to guide Go/No-Go decisions within the Design–Make–Test–Analyze (DMTA) cycle. However, conventional decision heuristics typically rely on a single cutoff, leading to a rigid binary select/discard paradigm. This approach is particularly ill-suited for borderline compounds near the decision boundary, where screening decisions are especially sensitive to prediction uncertainty and premature choices may either discard viable leads or advance likely failures, thereby increasing downstream assay costs. To address this limitation, we propose Regional Selection (RS), an uncertainty-aware three-way decision framework that partitions compounds into Predicted Pass, Predicted Fail, and Predicted Indeterminate regions. By explicitly reserving high-uncertainty compounds for targeted follow-up, RS avoids the pitfalls of premature binary classification. We formalize this framework through Regional Selection Inference (RSI), which casts region assignment as a multiple-hypothesis testing problem. We develop two imple- mentations of RSI: an empirical calibration-based method (RSI-EC), which thresholds uncertainty-normalized scores via empirical calibration, and a conformal selectionbased method (RSI-CS), which constructs conformal p-values for region assignment. RSI-EC is supported by large-sample calibration arguments, whereas RSI-CS provides finite-sample, distribution-free guarantees under exchangeability. Extensive evaluations across 15 high-dimensional QSAR benchmarks show that both RSI procedures reliably control the false discovery rate while maintaining high screening power. In limited-data regimes, RSI-CS yields particularly stable FDR control, whereas RSI-EC can be slightly less conservative; both perform strongly as sample sizes increase. We further study a cost-aware extension that incorporates asymmetric downstream costs through the score construction while keeping the nominal FDR target fixed. This extension introduces a tuning parameter that can reduce realized downstream cost, with dataset-dependent trade-offs against screening power. Overall, RSI offers a mathematically grounded and resource-aware alternative to single-threshold screening, allowing discovery teams to better balance decision confidence with assay budgets.

ChemRxiv
Eli Lilly (United States) (US), University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), McGill University (CA), University of York (GB), Stanford University (US)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon