Right-wing populism and civil society organisations: patterns of constraint and resilience in Italy

This article examines how right-wing populist governments reconfigure relations with civil society organisations (CSOs). It argues that outcomes depend on the intersection of populist government incumbency, civil society embeddedness, and political opportunity structures. Rather than uniformly shrinking civic space, populist rule produces selective patterns of constraint and adaptation. Drawing on 16 interviews and documentary evidence, the Italian case illustrates this logic: under the Meloni government, welfare and faith-based CSOs retain formal access but lose substantive influence, while migration NGOs face intensified regulatory and discursive constraints. Reciprocal dependence in welfare provision and partially open opportunity structures limit systematic exclusion but enable procedural marginalisation. The framework explains how intersecting conditions produce differentiated patterns of vulnerability and resilience within civil society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South European Society & Politics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2026.2718098
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Right-wing populism and civil society organisations: patterns of constraint and resilience in Italy

Cecilia Santilli
South European Society & Politics
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Right-wing populism and civil society organisations: patterns of constraint and resilience in Italy

Cecilia Santilli
article en

Abstract

This article examines how right-wing populist governments reconfigure relations with civil society organisations (CSOs). It argues that outcomes depend on the intersection of populist government incumbency, civil society embeddedness, and political opportunity structures. Rather than uniformly shrinking civic space, populist rule produces selective patterns of constraint and adaptation. Drawing on 16 interviews and documentary evidence, the Italian case illustrates this logic: under the Meloni government, welfare and faith-based CSOs retain formal access but lose substantive influence, while migration NGOs face intensified regulatory and discursive constraints. Reciprocal dependence in welfare provision and partially open opportunity structures limit systematic exclusion but enable procedural marginalisation. The framework explains how intersecting conditions produce differentiated patterns of vulnerability and resilience within civil society.

South European Society & Politics
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon