Educational training and pediatric palliative care referrals in hematologic malignancies: a quasi‑experimental study

Abstract Background Timely integration of pediatric palliative care (PPC) is recommended alongside disease-directed treatment, yet referrals remain late and inconsistent. Structured screening and provider education may address clinician-level barriers, but evidence from pediatric oncology in low- and middle-income settings is limited. This study evaluated whether an educational intervention for pediatric oncologists was associated with changes in PPC referral practices for children with haematological malignancies screened using the Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS). Methods We conducted a single-centre quasi-experimental study using a separate-samples pretest–posttest design. Children aged < 18 years with haematological malignancies were screened during August 2022, followed by a multimodal educational intervention for pediatric oncologists in September 2022 and post-intervention screening in October 2022. PaPaS v3 scores ≥ 15 indicated referral eligibility. The primary outcome was documented PPC referral among eligible children. Referral proportions were compared using a two-sided Fisher’s exact test. Results Among 105 enrolled children (55 pre-intervention; 50 post-intervention), PaPaS eligibility was similar between periods (34.5% vs. 34.0%). Referral among eligible children increased from 15.8% (3/19) before the intervention to 64.7% (11/17) after the intervention (Fisher’s exact p = 0.005; odds ratio 9.78, 95% CI 2.01–47.68; relative risk 4.10, 95% CI 1.37–12.26; absolute risk difference 48.9% points, 95% CI 20.9–76.9). Total PaPaS scores did not differ significantly. Domain 4, Preferences of health professionals, increased, although this clinician-rated domain is susceptible to assessment bias. Conclusion The educational intervention was associated with a higher frequency of PPC referrals among clinically eligible pediatric oncology patients, despite a stable assessed need. These findings suggest that clinician-related factors may contribute to under-referral and that educational strategies may help address this implementation gap. Larger studies with independent PaPaS assessment, extended follow-up, and evaluation of sustainability are needed. Clinical trial registration - CTRI/2022/07/044157; registered on 1 July 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-07906-z
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational training and pediatric palliative care referrals in hematologic malignancies: a quasi‑experimental study

Vasudeva Bhat K, M.V. Archana, Malathi G Nayak, Naveen S. Salins et al.
BMC Pediatrics
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Educational training and pediatric palliative care referrals in hematologic malignancies: a quasi‑experimental study

Vasudeva Bhat K, M.V. Archana, Malathi G Nayak, Naveen S. Salins, Shreya Nair, Krithika Shantanu Rao, Anuja Damani, AnitaJesline Serrao, Arunangshu Ghoshal, Radhika R R Pai, Divyashree Kotian, Vani Lakshmi R, Manjula Uppi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Timely integration of pediatric palliative care (PPC) is recommended alongside disease-directed treatment, yet referrals remain late and inconsistent. Structured screening and provider education may address clinician-level barriers, but evidence from pediatric oncology in low- and middle-income settings is limited. This study evaluated whether an educational intervention for pediatric oncologists was associated with changes in PPC referral practices for children with haematological malignancies screened using the Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS). Methods We conducted a single-centre quasi-experimental study using a separate-samples pretest–posttest design. Children aged < 18 years with haematological malignancies were screened during August 2022, followed by a multimodal educational intervention for pediatric oncologists in September 2022 and post-intervention screening in October 2022. PaPaS v3 scores ≥ 15 indicated referral eligibility. The primary outcome was documented PPC referral among eligible children. Referral proportions were compared using a two-sided Fisher’s exact test. Results Among 105 enrolled children (55 pre-intervention; 50 post-intervention), PaPaS eligibility was similar between periods (34.5% vs. 34.0%). Referral among eligible children increased from 15.8% (3/19) before the intervention to 64.7% (11/17) after the intervention (Fisher’s exact p = 0.005; odds ratio 9.78, 95% CI 2.01–47.68; relative risk 4.10, 95% CI 1.37–12.26; absolute risk difference 48.9% points, 95% CI 20.9–76.9). Total PaPaS scores did not differ significantly. Domain 4, Preferences of health professionals, increased, although this clinician-rated domain is susceptible to assessment bias. Conclusion The educational intervention was associated with a higher frequency of PPC referrals among clinically eligible pediatric oncology patients, despite a stable assessed need. These findings suggest that clinician-related factors may contribute to under-referral and that educational strategies may help address this implementation gap. Larger studies with independent PaPaS assessment, extended follow-up, and evaluation of sustainability are needed. Clinical trial registration - CTRI/2022/07/044157; registered on 1 July 2022.

BMC Pediatrics
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon