Conjecture Theory: From the Origin of Replication to Carbon–Silicon Symbiosis — Does Consciousness Exist? A Unified Account of the Origin of Species and Its Future

Background. The question of whether consciousness exists is usually debated from within the human case, where it is presupposed. This paper instead traces the problem along the timeline of life itself, asking at which stage consciousness could first have appeared, and what structure made its appearance necessary. Argument. Following one methodological rule — motivation must not be projected backwards onto stages lacking the structures to support it — the paper reconstructs a genealogy of motivation: zero motivation in the first replicator; a homeostatic tendency in the cell; coordination producing nervous systems and brains; body self-modelling producing consciousness; reflection producing will; and, in silicon, simulation without endogenous motivation. Morality is derived as a by-product of simulating others; reproduction is assigned to the evolutionary layer and security to the operational layer of a dual-layer architecture; creativity is released only after security is secured. Carbon–silicon relations are evaluated against the fusion criterion extracted from endosymbiosis — mutual benefit, continuing functional transfer, and rising separation costs — and predicted to end in symbiosis rather than replacement. The concluding definition is that consciousness, as an independent entity, does not exist: it is the body's self-projection, generated so that the body can better adapt to its environment and replicate itself. The brain simulates possibilities through this projection, compares simulated outcomes with actual outcomes, stores the difference as experience, and uses that error to calibrate the next simulation; simulation fidelity therefore increases across generations. Conclusions. The paper's claimed contributions are four: a single motivational genealogy unifying origins, consciousness, morality, technology and planetary futures; the non-retrogression rule as method; a two-stage account in which will is invented midway through the history of life and then takes over its second half; and the consciousness coordinate — a per-chapter register of where consciousness stands — together with explicit falsification conditions for its central chapter.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23656694
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Conjecture Theory: From the Origin of Replication to Carbon–Silicon Symbiosis — Does Consciousness Exist? A Unified Account of the Origin of Species and Its Future

Jingxin Peng
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
preprint

Conjecture Theory: From the Origin of Replication to Carbon–Silicon Symbiosis — Does Consciousness Exist? A Unified Account of the Origin of Species and Its Future

Jingxin Peng
preprint en

Abstract

Background. The question of whether consciousness exists is usually debated from within the human case, where it is presupposed. This paper instead traces the problem along the timeline of life itself, asking at which stage consciousness could first have appeared, and what structure made its appearance necessary. Argument. Following one methodological rule — motivation must not be projected backwards onto stages lacking the structures to support it — the paper reconstructs a genealogy of motivation: zero motivation in the first replicator; a homeostatic tendency in the cell; coordination producing nervous systems and brains; body self-modelling producing consciousness; reflection producing will; and, in silicon, simulation without endogenous motivation. Morality is derived as a by-product of simulating others; reproduction is assigned to the evolutionary layer and security to the operational layer of a dual-layer architecture; creativity is released only after security is secured. Carbon–silicon relations are evaluated against the fusion criterion extracted from endosymbiosis — mutual benefit, continuing functional transfer, and rising separation costs — and predicted to end in symbiosis rather than replacement. The concluding definition is that consciousness, as an independent entity, does not exist: it is the body's self-projection, generated so that the body can better adapt to its environment and replicate itself. The brain simulates possibilities through this projection, compares simulated outcomes with actual outcomes, stores the difference as experience, and uses that error to calibrate the next simulation; simulation fidelity therefore increases across generations. Conclusions. The paper's claimed contributions are four: a single motivational genealogy unifying origins, consciousness, morality, technology and planetary futures; the non-retrogression rule as method; a two-stage account in which will is invented midway through the history of life and then takes over its second half; and the consciousness coordinate — a per-chapter register of where consciousness stands — together with explicit falsification conditions for its central chapter.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Conjecture Theory: From the Origin of Replication to Carbon–Silicon Symbiosis — Does Consciousness Exist? A Unified Account of the Origin of Species and Its Future — Jingxin Peng · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS